ARRNF vs. HBM
ARRNF (American Rare Earths Limited) and HBM (Hudbay Minerals Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — ARRNF in Other Industrial Metals & Mining, HBM in Copper. Over the past 5 years, ARRNF returned 70.94%/yr vs 32.02%/yr for HBM. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ARRNF vs. HBM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARRNF achieves a 39.00% return, which is significantly lower than HBM's 52.84% return.
ARRNF
- 1D
- -7.33%
- 1M
- 11.33%
- YTD
- 39.00%
- 6M
- 8.55%
- 1Y
- 58.86%
- 3Y*
- 41.65%
- 5Y*
- 70.94%
- 10Y*
- —
HBM
- 1D
- -4.83%
- 1M
- 39.32%
- YTD
- 52.84%
- 6M
- 74.46%
- 1Y
- 224.34%
- 3Y*
- 85.63%
- 5Y*
- 32.02%
- 10Y*
- 22.30%
ARRNF vs. HBM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARRNF American Rare Earths Limited | 39.00% | 23.89% | 41.25% | -11.60% | 4.42% | 550.00% | -20.00% |
HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 52.84% | 145.46% | 47.03% | 9.24% | -29.87% | 3.82% | 98.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARRNF and HBM is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2020 | 0.14 |
Fundamentals
ARRNF:
$162.68M
HBM:
$12.09B
ARRNF:
-$0.02
HBM:
$1.65
ARRNF:
3.38
HBM:
3.41
ARRNF:
-$128.85K
HBM:
$2.37B
ARRNF:
-$385.87K
HBM:
$828.54M
ARRNF:
-$12.72M
HBM:
$1.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARRNF vs. HBM — Risk / Return Rank
ARRNF
HBM
ARRNF vs. HBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARRNF | HBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.50 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 6.25 | -5.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.21 | 20.01 | -18.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARRNF | HBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 4.01 | -3.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.59 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.22 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
ARRNF vs. HBM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARRNF drawdown since its inception was -83.01%, smaller than the maximum HBM drawdown of -92.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARRNF and HBM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARRNF | HBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.01% | -92.21% | +9.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.13% | -36.16% | -32.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.13% | -41.11% | -28.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.01% | -63.33% | -19.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.09% | -4.83% | -52.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.24% | -52.52% | +6.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.94% | 11.27% | +37.67% |
Volatility
ARRNF vs. HBM - Volatility Comparison
American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF) has a higher volatility of 23.12% compared to Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) at 19.39%. This indicates that ARRNF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARRNF | HBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.12% | 19.39% | +3.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.61% | 44.29% | +5.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 126.38% | 56.41% | +69.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 314.60% | 55.04% | +259.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 290.52% | 58.73% | +231.79% |
Dividends
ARRNF vs. HBM - Dividend Comparison
ARRNF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARRNF American Rare Earths Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.32% | 0.22% | 0.21% | 0.36% | 0.38% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.52% |
Financials
ARRNF vs. HBM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Rare Earths Limited and Hudbay Minerals Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ARRNF and HBM have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARRNF has higher volatility (23.12%) compared to HBM (19.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARRNF dropped -83.01% vs HBM's -92.21%.
HBM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.01 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARRNF and HBM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer