ARMY vs. HRTS
ARMY (Tema International Defense ETF) and HRTS (Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARMY is a Aerospace & Defense fund actively managed by Tema, while HRTS is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Tema. Both are actively managed. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ARMY charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HRTS.
Performance
ARMY vs. HRTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARMY
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
HRTS
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- 6M
- 2.43%
- YTD
- 3.25%
- 1Y
- 31.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.15%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $60.49K | $59.12K | $65.58K | |
| $413.90K | $241.96K | $213.63K |
ARMY vs. HRTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARMY Tema International Defense ETF | 2.13% |
HRTS Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF | 11.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMY and HRTS is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2026 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMY vs. HRTS — Risk / Return Rank
ARMY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HRTS
ARMY vs. HRTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema International Defense ETF (ARMY) and Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARMY | HRTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.24 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARMY vs. HRTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMY drawdown since its inception was -16.37%, smaller than the maximum HRTS drawdown of -25.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMY and HRTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMY | HRTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.37% | -25.81% | +9.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.39% | -3.01% | -3.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.53% | -8.69% | +1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.52% | — |
Volatility
ARMY vs. HRTS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMY | HRTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.33% | 16.36% | +14.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.33% | 19.05% | +12.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.33% | 19.05% | +12.28% |
ARMY vs. HRTS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMY has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than HRTS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMY vs. HRTS - Dividend Comparison
ARMY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HRTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ARMY Tema International Defense ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HRTS Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF | 1.30% | 1.34% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMY and HRTS have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMY is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMY is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HRTS.
HRTS has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.00% for ARMY.
ARMY is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while HRTS is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for ARMY and 0.75% for HRTS.
Find the right allocation for ARMY and HRTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer