ARMW vs. BUCK
ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) and BUCK (Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARMW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill Investments, while BUCK is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARMW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BUCK.
Performance
ARMW vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARMW achieves a 161.70% return, which is significantly higher than BUCK's 2.42% return.
ARMW
- 1D
- -7.36%
- 1M
- -40.52%
- 6M
- 177.20%
- YTD
- 161.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUCK
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- 2.42%
- 1Y
- 7.57%
- 3Y*
- 5.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMW vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 161.70% | -41.28% |
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 2.42% | 0.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMW and BUCK is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMW vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank
ARMW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BUCK
ARMW vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARMW | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.62 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 9.08 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 42.55 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARMW vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMW drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMW and BUCK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMW | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.47% | -5.43% | -43.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.33% | -0.02% | -47.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.96% | -0.48% | -25.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.18% | — |
Volatility
ARMW vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMW | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 95.20% | 2.74% | +92.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.20% | 3.44% | +91.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.20% | 3.44% | +91.76% |
ARMW vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMW vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison
ARMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 50.52%, more than BUCK's 7.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 50.52% | 16.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 7.29% | 7.59% | 8.84% | 4.84% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMW and BUCK have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.
ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 50.52%, compared with 7.29% for BUCK.
ARMW is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for ARMW and 0.35% for BUCK.
Find the right allocation for ARMW and BUCK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer