ARMH vs. TEKY
ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) and TEKY (Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TEKY.
Performance
ARMH vs. TEKY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARMH
- 1D
- -6.83%
- 1M
- -20.34%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TEKY
- 1D
- -2.97%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- 6M
- 14.63%
- YTD
- 17.43%
- 1Y
- 30.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMH vs. TEKY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | -3.02% |
TEKY Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF | -3.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMH and TEKY is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMH vs. TEKY — Risk / Return Rank
ARMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TEKY
ARMH vs. TEKY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF (TEKY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARMH | TEKY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.41 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARMH vs. TEKY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, which is greater than TEKY's maximum drawdown of -21.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and TEKY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMH | TEKY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.10% | -21.43% | -10.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.10% | -7.69% | -24.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.18% | -4.81% | -10.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.91% | — |
Volatility
ARMH vs. TEKY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMH | TEKY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.51% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 105.58% | 26.40% | +79.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 105.58% | 27.27% | +78.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 105.58% | 27.27% | +78.31% |
ARMH vs. TEKY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than TEKY's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMH vs. TEKY - Dividend Comparison
ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TEKY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TEKY Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF | 0.17% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMH and TEKY have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TEKY.
TEKY has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.
They also come from different issuers: Precidian and Lazard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.50% for TEKY.
Find the right allocation for ARMH and TEKY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer