ARMH vs. NURE

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) and NURE (Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARMH is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Precidian, while NURE is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Short-Term REIT Index. ARMH is actively managed, while NURE is passively managed. Their -0.60 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ARMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NURE.

Performance

ARMH vs. NURE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ARMH

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -24.02%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

NURE

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -0.58%
• 6M: 18.91%
• YTD: 18.91%
• 1Y: 20.87%
• 3Y*: 7.98%
• 5Y*: 1.68%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	$185.31K	$454.05K	$691.73K
NURE Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF	$89.66K	$88.12K	$134.65K

ARMH vs. NURE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	-22.64%
NURE Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF	6.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ARMH and NURE is -0.60, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	-0.60

Return for Risk

ARMH vs. NURE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARMH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NURE

NURE Risk / Return Rank: 52
NURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
NURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
NURE Omega Ratio Rank: 48
NURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
NURE Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARMH vs. NURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARMH	NURE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.32	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.96	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.23	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.29	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.66	—

Drawdowns

ARMH vs. NURE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -48.81%, which is greater than NURE's maximum drawdown of -46.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and NURE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARMH	NURE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.81%	-46.05%	-2.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.13%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.83%	-6.25%	-39.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.50%	-12.22%	-11.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.69%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ARMH	NURE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.87%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.67%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	97.98%	15.86%	+82.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	97.98%	19.69%	+78.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	97.98%	21.72%	+76.26%

ARMH vs. NURE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than NURE's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARMH vs. NURE - Dividend Comparison

ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NURE Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF	4.02%	4.56%	3.51%	3.73%	2.80%	1.34%	3.41%	3.28%	4.11%	3.86%	0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARMH and NURE in my portfolio?

ARMH and NURE have a correlation of -0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ARMH or NURE?

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARMH or NURE?

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NURE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARMH or NURE?

NURE has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.

What is the main difference between ARMH and NURE?

ARMH is categorized as Technology Equities, while NURE is REIT. They also come from different issuers: Precidian and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.35% for NURE.