PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARMG vs. RTXG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARMG vs. RTXG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARMG achieves a 188.60% return, which is significantly higher than RTXG's 26.52% return.


ARMG

1D
-0.48%
1M
-46.52%
6M
209.21%
YTD
188.60%
1Y
58.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.97%

RTXG

1D
1.25%
1M
17.00%
6M
7.08%
YTD
26.52%
1Y
65.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
84.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$14.41M$19.14M$65.85M
$961.72K$622.33K$626.49K

ARMG vs. RTXG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ARMG and RTXG is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARMG vs. RTXG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARMG
ARMG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
ARMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARMG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
ARMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARMG Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

RTXG
RTXG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
RTXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTXG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
RTXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTXG Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARMG vs. RTXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARMGRTXGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.24

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

1.75

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.43

4.03

-2.60

ARMG vs. RTXG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARMG Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the RTXG Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARMG and RTXG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARMG vs. RTXG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMG drawdown since its inception was -80.28%, which is greater than RTXG's maximum drawdown of -37.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMG and RTXG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARMGRTXGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.28%

-37.49%

-42.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.64%

-37.49%

-39.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.68%

-3.28%

-70.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.19%

-10.33%

-41.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.34%

16.21%

+25.13%

Volatility

ARMG vs. RTXG - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) has a higher volatility of 49.60% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG) at 17.43%. This indicates that ARMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTXG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARMGRTXGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

49.60%

17.43%

+32.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

128.11%

40.50%

+87.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

147.13%

51.96%

+95.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

145.23%

51.13%

+94.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

145.23%

51.13%

+94.10%

ARMG vs. RTXG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ARMG and RTXG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

ARMG vs. RTXG - Dividend Comparison

ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than RTXG's 5.03% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ARMG and RTXG have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARMG has higher volatility (49.60%) compared to RTXG (17.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARMG dropped -80.28% vs RTXG's -37.49%.

On 1-year performance, RTXG leads with 65.13% vs 58.82% for ARMG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, RTXG has been the lower-risk option at 17.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RTXG has performed better with a 65.13% return vs 58.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ARMG and RTXG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

RTXG has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 1.69% for ARMG.

RTXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARMG and RTXG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer