ARMG vs. IFED
ARMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF) and IFED (ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. ARMG is actively managed, while IFED is passively managed. Over the past year, ARMG returned 443.95% vs 2.46% for IFED. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for IFED.
Performance
ARMG vs. IFED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARMG achieves a 841.05% return, which is significantly higher than IFED's -2.98% return.
ARMG
- 1D
- -9.19%
- 1M
- 211.14%
- YTD
- 841.05%
- 6M
- 460.44%
- 1Y
- 443.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFED
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 5.41%
- YTD
- -2.98%
- 6M
- -2.59%
- 1Y
- 2.46%
- 3Y*
- 16.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMG vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 841.05% | -61.80% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | -2.98% | 13.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMG and IFED is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMG vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank
ARMG
IFED
ARMG vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARMG | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.04 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.57 | 0.17 | +6.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.59 | 0.43 | +11.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARMG | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.43 | 0.15 | +3.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.65 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
ARMG vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMG drawdown since its inception was -80.28%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMG and IFED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMG | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.28% | -22.36% | -57.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.13% | -14.65% | -53.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.19% | -4.97% | -4.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.91% | -5.84% | -47.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.55% | 5.76% | +32.79% |
Volatility
ARMG vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) has a higher volatility of 66.47% compared to ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) at 4.51%. This indicates that ARMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMG | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 66.47% | 4.51% | +61.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 104.49% | 12.87% | +91.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 130.67% | 16.18% | +114.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 138.36% | 19.87% | +118.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 138.36% | 19.87% | +118.49% |
ARMG vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMG vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison
ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 0.52% | 4.86% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMG and IFED have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARMG has higher volatility (66.47%) compared to IFED (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARMG dropped -80.28% vs IFED's -22.36%.
On 1-year performance, ARMG leads with 443.95% vs 2.46% for IFED. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, IFED has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ARMG has performed better with a 443.95% return vs 2.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARMG.
ARMG has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for IFED.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARMG and 0.45% for IFED.
ARMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.43 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARMG and IFED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer