ARMG vs. BLSG
ARMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF) and BLSG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
ARMG vs. BLSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARMG achieves a 188.60% return, which is significantly higher than BLSG's -76.13% return.
ARMG
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -46.52%
- 6M
- 209.21%
- YTD
- 188.60%
- 1Y
- 58.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.97%
BLSG
- 1D
- 9.11%
- 1M
- -24.18%
- 6M
- -56.67%
- YTD
- -76.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.41M | $19.14M | $65.85M | |
| $285.30K | $214.72K | $288.11K |
ARMG vs. BLSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 188.60% | -61.02% |
BLSG Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF | -76.13% | -58.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMG and BLSG is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMG vs. BLSG — Risk / Return Rank
ARMG
BLSG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ARMG vs. BLSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARMG | BLSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.43 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARMG vs. BLSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMG drawdown since its inception was -80.28%, smaller than the maximum BLSG drawdown of -91.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMG and BLSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMG | BLSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.28% | -91.34% | +11.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.68% | -90.45% | +16.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.19% | -65.81% | +13.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.34% | — | — |
Volatility
ARMG vs. BLSG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMG | BLSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 49.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 128.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 147.13% | 146.36% | +0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 145.23% | 146.36% | -1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 145.23% | 146.36% | -1.13% |
ARMG vs. BLSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ARMG and BLSG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
ARMG vs. BLSG - Dividend Comparison
ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while BLSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 1.69% | 4.86% |
BLSG Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMG and BLSG have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMG and BLSG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
ARMG has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 0.00% for BLSG.
Find the right allocation for ARMG and BLSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer