ARKX vs. XLG

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ARKX (ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKX is a Aerospace & Defense fund actively managed by ARK, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. ARKX is actively managed, while XLG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ARKX returned 10.38%/yr vs 15.12%/yr for XLG. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

ARKX vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKX achieves a 16.56% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 3.62% return.

ARKX

• 1D: -1.94%
• 1M: -2.96%
• YTD: 16.56%
• 6M: 17.78%
• 1Y: 52.99%
• 3Y*: 31.55%
• 5Y*: 10.38%
• 10Y*: —

XLG

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -3.40%
• YTD: 3.62%
• 6M: 4.26%
• 1Y: 21.79%
• 3Y*: 22.23%
• 5Y*: 15.12%
• 10Y*: 16.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKX vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ARKX ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF	16.56%	48.46%	26.67%	24.37%	-34.27%	-8.05%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	3.62%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	25.49%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKX and XLG is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2021	0.70

The correlation between ARKX and XLG shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ARKX vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ARKX	XLG
Industrials	55.7%	1.9%
Technology	27.4%	43.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	11.3%
Communication Services	7.6%	17.1%
Healthcare	1.5%	7.0%
Basic Materials	0.0%	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.8%
Energy	-	2.7%
Financial Services	-	9.6%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ARKX vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKX

ARKX Risk / Return Rank: 51
ARKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
ARKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
ARKX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
ARKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
ARKX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 48
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 52
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKX vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARKX	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	1.60	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	2.19	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.29	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	1.76	+0.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.87	6.46	+0.41

ARKX vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARKX and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARKX vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKX drawdown since its inception was -43.61%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKX and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARKX	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.61%	-52.39%	+8.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.42%	-12.41%	-8.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.47%	-20.70%	-4.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.61%	-28.02%	-15.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.49%	-5.06%	-5.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.92%	-7.64%	-12.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.74%	3.38%	+4.36%

Volatility

ARKX vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX) has a higher volatility of 12.77% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 4.31%. This indicates that ARKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARKX	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.77%	4.31%	+8.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.51%	10.41%	+16.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.50%	13.70%	+19.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.02%	18.73%	+9.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.65%	18.87%	+8.78%

ARKX vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARKX vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

ARKX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARKX ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.62%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARKX and XLG in my portfolio?

ARKX and XLG have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARKX or XLG?

ARKX has higher volatility (12.77%) compared to XLG (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKX dropped -43.61% vs XLG's -52.39%.

Which ETF is better, ARKX or XLG?

On 5-year performance, XLG leads with 15.12% vs 10.38% for ARKX. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ARKX or XLG?

Over the 5-year period, XLG has performed better with a 15.12% return vs 10.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARKX or XLG?

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARKX or XLG?

XLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for ARKX.

What is the main difference between ARKX and XLG?

ARKX is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while XLG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKX and 0.20% for XLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.