PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARKW vs. XME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARKW vs. XME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKW achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly lower than XME's 16.50% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKW has outperformed XME with an annualized return of 22.86%, while XME has yielded a comparatively lower 19.14% annualized return.


ARKW

1D
4.36%
1M
3.03%
YTD
-0.20%
6M
-1.16%
1Y
15.15%
3Y*
37.73%
5Y*
1.45%
10Y*
22.86%

XME

1D
0.16%
1M
4.36%
YTD
16.50%
6M
19.83%
1Y
85.37%
3Y*
35.28%
5Y*
22.93%
10Y*
19.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKW vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARKW
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF
-0.20%38.93%42.27%96.89%-67.49%-18.85%157.44%35.76%4.24%87.29%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
16.50%83.47%-4.54%21.51%13.13%34.92%15.95%14.69%-26.78%21.17%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKW and XME is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014

0.44

The correlation between ARKW and XME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

ARKW vs. XME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ARKW
XME

Technology

46.0%
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

15.8%

-

Communication Services

15.4%

-

Financial Services

13.6%

-

Industrials

1.5%
0.4%

Basic Materials

-

74.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.8%

Energy

-

23.8%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

ARKW
46.0%
XME
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ARKW
15.8%
XME

-

Communication Services

ARKW
15.4%
XME

-

Financial Services

ARKW
13.6%
XME

-

Industrials

ARKW
1.5%
XME
0.4%

Basic Materials

ARKW

-

XME
74.9%

Consumer Defensive

ARKW

-

XME
0.8%

Energy

ARKW

-

XME
23.8%

Healthcare

ARKW

-

XME

-

Real Estate

ARKW

-

XME

-

Utilities

ARKW

-

XME

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARKW vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKW
ARKW Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ARKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKW Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKW Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

XME
XME Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKW vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARKWXMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.37

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

3.80

-3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.85

9.44

-8.60

ARKW vs. XME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARKW Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the XME Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARKW and XME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARKW vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKW drawdown since its inception was -80.52%, smaller than the maximum XME drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKW and XME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARKWXMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.52%

-85.89%

+5.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.21%

-22.60%

-13.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.21%

-30.47%

-5.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.36%

-37.27%

-40.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.52%

-61.69%

-18.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.01%

-9.18%

-10.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.97%

-44.08%

+20.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.93%

9.07%

+8.86%

Volatility

ARKW vs. XME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) is 11.21%, while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a volatility of 15.14%. This indicates that ARKW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARKWXMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.21%

15.14%

-3.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.94%

28.15%

-3.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.21%

36.17%

-2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.64%

32.83%

+10.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.77%

32.93%

+4.84%

ARKW vs. XME - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKW has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than XME's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARKW vs. XME - Dividend Comparison

ARKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than XME's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKW
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF
1.59%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%1.29%0.00%13.05%2.05%0.00%2.29%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
0.32%0.38%0.65%1.00%1.64%0.70%0.99%2.43%2.23%1.15%1.02%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARKW and XME have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XME has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to ARKW (11.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKW dropped -80.52% vs XME's -85.89%.

On 10-year performance, ARKW leads with 22.86% vs 19.14% for XME. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ARKW has been the lower-risk option at 11.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ARKW has performed better with a 22.86% return vs 19.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.

ARKW has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.32% for XME.

ARKW is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while XME is Materials. They also come from different issuers: ARK and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for ARKW and 0.35% for XME.

XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARKW and XME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer