PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARKW vs. IXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARKW vs. IXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKW achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly lower than IXUS's 15.55% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKW has outperformed IXUS with an annualized return of 22.86%, while IXUS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.24% annualized return.


ARKW

1D
4.36%
1M
3.03%
YTD
-0.20%
6M
-1.16%
1Y
15.15%
3Y*
37.73%
5Y*
1.45%
10Y*
22.86%

IXUS

1D
1.49%
1M
4.72%
YTD
15.55%
6M
17.02%
1Y
32.06%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
8.74%
10Y*
10.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKW vs. IXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARKW
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF
-0.20%38.93%42.27%96.89%-67.49%-18.85%157.44%35.76%4.24%87.29%
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
15.55%32.40%5.19%15.83%-16.47%8.86%10.80%21.71%-14.41%28.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKW and IXUS is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014

0.60

The correlation between ARKW and IXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

ARKW vs. IXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ARKW
IXUS

Technology

46.0%
24.0%

Consumer Cyclical

15.8%
7.1%

Communication Services

15.4%
4.6%

Financial Services

13.6%
22.9%

Industrials

1.5%
13.9%

Basic Materials

-

7.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.6%

Energy

-

4.8%

Healthcare

-

6.4%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Technology

ARKW
46.0%
IXUS
24.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ARKW
15.8%
IXUS
7.1%

Communication Services

ARKW
15.4%
IXUS
4.6%

Financial Services

ARKW
13.6%
IXUS
22.9%

Industrials

ARKW
1.5%
IXUS
13.9%

Basic Materials

ARKW

-

IXUS
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

ARKW

-

IXUS
4.6%

Energy

ARKW

-

IXUS
4.8%

Healthcare

ARKW

-

IXUS
6.4%

Real Estate

ARKW

-

IXUS
1.2%

Utilities

ARKW

-

IXUS
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARKW vs. IXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKW
ARKW Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ARKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKW Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKW Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

IXUS
IXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKW vs. IXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARKWIXUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.37

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

2.84

-2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.85

10.91

-10.06

ARKW vs. IXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARKW Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the IXUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARKW and IXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARKW vs. IXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKW drawdown since its inception was -80.52%, which is greater than IXUS's maximum drawdown of -36.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKW and IXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARKWIXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.52%

-36.22%

-44.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.21%

-11.36%

-24.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.21%

-13.75%

-22.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.36%

-30.03%

-47.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.52%

-36.22%

-44.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.01%

-0.11%

-19.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.97%

-7.49%

-16.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.93%

2.95%

+14.98%

Volatility

ARKW vs. IXUS - Volatility Comparison

ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) has a higher volatility of 11.21% compared to iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) at 7.02%. This indicates that ARKW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARKWIXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.21%

7.02%

+4.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.94%

14.29%

+10.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.21%

16.31%

+16.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.64%

16.40%

+27.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.77%

17.13%

+20.64%

ARKW vs. IXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKW has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than IXUS's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARKW vs. IXUS - Dividend Comparison

ARKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than IXUS's 4.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKW
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF
1.59%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%1.29%0.00%13.05%2.05%0.00%2.29%
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
4.12%3.24%3.33%3.13%2.48%3.12%1.85%3.09%3.00%2.41%2.58%2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARKW and IXUS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARKW has higher volatility (11.21%) compared to IXUS (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKW dropped -80.52% vs IXUS's -36.22%.

On 10-year performance, ARKW leads with 22.86% vs 10.24% for IXUS. On fees, IXUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IXUS has been the lower-risk option at 7.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ARKW has performed better with a 22.86% return vs 10.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.

IXUS has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 1.59% for ARKW.

ARKW is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while IXUS is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: ARK and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for ARKW and 0.07% for IXUS.

IXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARKW and IXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer