PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARKW vs. IWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARKW vs. IWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKW achieves a -0.79% return, which is significantly lower than IWR's 12.43% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKW has outperformed IWR with an annualized return of 22.99%, while IWR has yielded a comparatively lower 11.55% annualized return.


ARKW

1D
-2.98%
1M
2.53%
YTD
-0.79%
6M
-3.36%
1Y
19.55%
3Y*
40.12%
5Y*
1.89%
10Y*
22.99%

IWR

1D
-0.26%
1M
3.79%
YTD
12.43%
6M
12.21%
1Y
21.66%
3Y*
17.25%
5Y*
8.00%
10Y*
11.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKW vs. IWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARKW
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF
-0.79%38.93%42.27%96.89%-67.49%-18.85%157.44%35.76%4.24%87.29%
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
12.43%10.37%15.21%17.05%-17.48%22.44%16.93%30.23%-9.10%18.25%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKW and IWR is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014

0.69

The correlation between ARKW and IWR shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ARKW vs. IWR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ARKW
IWR

Technology

44.2%
17.2%

Consumer Cyclical

16.3%
11.2%

Communication Services

15.0%
3.4%

Financial Services

14.2%
12.5%

Industrials

1.7%
18.4%

Basic Materials

-

4.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.1%

Energy

-

7.2%

Healthcare

-

8.7%

Real Estate

-

7.0%

Utilities

-

6.1%

Technology

ARKW
44.2%
IWR
17.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ARKW
16.3%
IWR
11.2%

Communication Services

ARKW
15.0%
IWR
3.4%

Financial Services

ARKW
14.2%
IWR
12.5%

Industrials

ARKW
1.7%
IWR
18.4%

Basic Materials

ARKW

-

IWR
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

ARKW

-

IWR
4.1%

Energy

ARKW

-

IWR
7.2%

Healthcare

ARKW

-

IWR
8.7%

Real Estate

ARKW

-

IWR
7.0%

Utilities

ARKW

-

IWR
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARKW vs. IWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKW
ARKW Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
ARKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKW Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKW Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

IWR
IWR Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
IWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWR Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKW vs. IWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARKWIWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.28

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

2.66

-2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.12

10.28

-9.16

ARKW vs. IWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARKW Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the IWR Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARKW and IWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARKWIWRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

1.63

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.44

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.60

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.49

+0.08

Drawdowns

ARKW vs. IWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKW drawdown since its inception was -80.52%, which is greater than IWR's maximum drawdown of -58.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKW and IWR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARKWIWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.52%

-58.78%

-21.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.21%

-8.17%

-28.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.21%

-21.09%

-15.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.36%

-26.18%

-51.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.52%

-40.59%

-39.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.48%

-0.26%

-20.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.98%

-7.80%

-16.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.52%

2.11%

+15.41%

Volatility

ARKW vs. IWR - Volatility Comparison

ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) has a higher volatility of 7.95% compared to iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) at 3.26%. This indicates that ARKW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARKWIWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.95%

3.26%

+4.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.54%

9.84%

+13.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.93%

13.39%

+19.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.49%

18.23%

+25.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.69%

19.36%

+18.33%

ARKW vs. IWR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKW has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than IWR's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARKW vs. IWR - Dividend Comparison

ARKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than IWR's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKW
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF
1.60%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%1.29%0.00%13.05%2.05%0.00%2.29%
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
1.15%1.29%1.27%1.43%1.59%1.04%1.28%1.43%1.98%1.52%1.72%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARKW and IWR have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARKW has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to IWR (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKW dropped -80.52% vs IWR's -58.78%.

On 10-year performance, ARKW leads with 22.99% vs 11.55% for IWR. On fees, IWR is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IWR has been the lower-risk option at 3.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ARKW has performed better with a 22.99% return vs 11.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWR is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.

ARKW has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 1.15% for IWR.

They also come from different issuers: ARK and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for ARKW and 0.19% for IWR.

IWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARKW and IWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer