ARKW vs. HDV
ARKW (ARK Next Generation Internet ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKW is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ARK, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. ARKW is actively managed, while HDV is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ARKW returned 22.53%/yr vs 9.45%/yr for HDV. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARKW charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
ARKW vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKW achieves a -4.76% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 14.07% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKW has outperformed HDV with an annualized return of 22.53%, while HDV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.45% annualized return.
ARKW
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- -4.76%
- 6M
- -7.39%
- 1Y
- -0.64%
- 3Y*
- 36.73%
- 5Y*
- -1.21%
- 10Y*
- 22.53%
HDV
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- 14.07%
- 6M
- 14.08%
- 1Y
- 21.06%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 11.09%
- 10Y*
- 9.45%
ARKW vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | -4.76% | 38.93% | 42.27% | 96.89% | -67.49% | -18.85% | 157.44% | 35.76% | 4.24% | 87.29% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 14.07% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKW and HDV is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014 | 0.30 |
The correlation between ARKW and HDV shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ARKW vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARKW
HDV
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
ARKW
HDV
Communication Services
ARKW
HDV
Consumer Cyclical
ARKW
HDV
Financial Services
ARKW
HDV
Industrials
ARKW
HDV
Basic Materials
ARKW
-
HDV
Consumer Defensive
ARKW
-
HDV
Energy
ARKW
-
HDV
Healthcare
ARKW
-
HDV
Real Estate
ARKW
-
HDV
-
Utilities
ARKW
-
HDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKW vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
ARKW
HDV
ARKW vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKW | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.36 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 4.09 | -4.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.04 | 11.19 | -11.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKW vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKW drawdown since its inception was -80.52%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKW and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKW | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.52% | -37.04% | -43.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.21% | -5.18% | -31.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.21% | -10.49% | -25.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.36% | -15.42% | -61.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.52% | -37.04% | -43.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.67% | -1.35% | -22.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.97% | -3.08% | -20.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.14% | 1.89% | +16.25% |
Volatility
ARKW vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) has a higher volatility of 11.08% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 3.64%. This indicates that ARKW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKW | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.08% | 3.64% | +7.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.74% | 7.61% | +17.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.81% | 9.93% | +22.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.66% | 12.81% | +30.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.78% | 15.73% | +22.05% |
ARKW vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKW has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKW vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
ARKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than HDV's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | 1.67% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 13.05% | 2.05% | 0.00% | 2.29% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.90% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKW and HDV have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKW has higher volatility (11.08%) compared to HDV (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKW dropped -80.52% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 10-year performance, ARKW leads with 22.53% vs 9.45% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ARKW has performed better with a 22.53% return vs 9.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 1.67% for ARKW.
ARKW is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while HDV is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: ARK and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for ARKW and 0.08% for HDV.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKW and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer