PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARKW vs. HDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARKW vs. HDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKW achieves a -4.64% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 19.66% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKW has outperformed HDV with an annualized return of 21.34%, while HDV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.57% annualized return.


ARKW

1D
2.95%
1M
-2.97%
6M
4.60%
YTD
-4.64%
1Y
-4.74%
3Y*
32.39%
5Y*
-0.92%
10Y*
21.34%
ALL TIME*
19.87%

HDV

1D
-0.31%
1M
2.46%
6M
10.00%
YTD
19.66%
1Y
25.24%
3Y*
15.80%
5Y*
12.13%
10Y*
9.57%
ALL TIME*
10.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.17M$12.26M$13.73M
$168.30M$156.51M$108.57M

ARKW vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARKW
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF
-4.64%38.93%42.27%96.89%-67.49%-18.85%157.44%35.76%4.24%87.29%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
19.66%11.90%14.16%1.72%7.05%19.45%-6.48%20.22%-3.01%13.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKW and HDV is -0.19, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014

0.29

The correlation between ARKW and HDV shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ARKW vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ARKW
HDV

Technology

49.7%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

16.8%
9.3%

Communication Services

15.3%
5.2%

Financial Services

14.7%
4.7%

Industrials

3.5%
2.8%

Basic Materials

-

0.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

24.3%

Energy

-

19.8%

Healthcare

-

23.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

8.2%

Technology

ARKW
49.7%
HDV
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ARKW
16.8%
HDV
9.3%

Communication Services

ARKW
15.3%
HDV
5.2%

Financial Services

ARKW
14.7%
HDV
4.7%

Industrials

ARKW
3.5%
HDV
2.8%

Basic Materials

ARKW

-

HDV
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

ARKW

-

HDV
24.3%

Energy

ARKW

-

HDV
19.8%

Healthcare

ARKW

-

HDV
23.9%

Real Estate

ARKW

-

HDV

-

Utilities

ARKW

-

HDV
8.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARKW vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARKW
ARKW Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
ARKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKW Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKW Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARKW vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARKWHDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.41

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.13

4.90

-5.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.25

13.39

-13.63

ARKW vs. HDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARKW Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the HDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARKW and HDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARKW vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKW drawdown since its inception was -80.52%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKW and HDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARKWHDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.52%

-37.04%

-43.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.21%

-5.18%

-31.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.21%

-10.49%

-25.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.36%

-15.42%

-61.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.52%

-37.04%

-43.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.57%

-1.72%

-21.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.95%

-3.06%

-20.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.38%

1.89%

+17.49%

Volatility

ARKW vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison

ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) has a higher volatility of 9.38% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 4.52%. This indicates that ARKW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARKWHDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.38%

4.52%

+4.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.80%

8.66%

+17.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.40%

10.83%

+22.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.79%

12.95%

+30.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.84%

15.79%

+22.05%

ARKW vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKW has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARKW vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison

ARKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than HDV's 3.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKW
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF
1.67%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%1.29%0.00%13.05%2.05%0.00%2.29%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
3.08%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARKW and HDV have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARKW has higher volatility (9.38%) compared to HDV (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKW dropped -80.52% vs HDV's -37.04%.

On 10-year performance, ARKW leads with 21.34% vs 9.57% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ARKW has performed better with a 21.34% return vs 9.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.

HDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 1.67% for ARKW.

ARKW is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while HDV is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: ARK and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for ARKW and 0.08% for HDV.

HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARKW and HDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer