ARKW vs. GILT
ARKW (ARK Next Generation Internet ETF) is Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ARK, while GILT (Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, ARKW returned 22.51%/yr vs 14.56%/yr for GILT. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ARKW vs. GILT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKW achieves a -4.37% return, which is significantly lower than GILT's 15.92% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKW has outperformed GILT with an annualized return of 22.51%, while GILT has yielded a comparatively lower 14.56% annualized return.
ARKW
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -3.08%
- YTD
- -4.37%
- 6M
- -7.45%
- 1Y
- 10.46%
- 3Y*
- 36.42%
- 5Y*
- 0.46%
- 10Y*
- 22.51%
GILT
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- -4.15%
- YTD
- 15.92%
- 6M
- 18.30%
- 1Y
- 138.10%
- 3Y*
- 37.66%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 14.56%
ARKW vs. GILT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | -4.37% | 38.93% | 42.27% | 96.89% | -67.49% | -18.85% | 157.44% | 35.76% | 4.24% | 87.29% |
GILT Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd | 15.92% | 110.41% | 0.65% | 5.34% | -17.96% | 18.14% | -12.01% | -9.43% | 18.35% | 54.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKW and GILT is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014 | 0.35 |
The correlation between ARKW and GILT shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKW vs. GILT — Risk / Return Rank
ARKW
GILT
ARKW vs. GILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKW | GILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.33 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | 3.97 | -3.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.59 | 9.96 | -9.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKW vs. GILT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKW drawdown since its inception was -80.52%, smaller than the maximum GILT drawdown of -99.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKW and GILT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKW | GILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.52% | -99.94% | +19.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.21% | -34.96% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.21% | -41.94% | +5.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.36% | -63.20% | -14.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.52% | -80.89% | +0.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.35% | -99.47% | +76.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.97% | -80.78% | +56.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.89% | 13.93% | +3.96% |
Volatility
ARKW vs. GILT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) is 10.38%, while Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT) has a volatility of 25.22%. This indicates that ARKW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GILT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKW | GILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.38% | 25.22% | -14.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.57% | 60.23% | -35.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.92% | 71.60% | -38.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.59% | 48.93% | -5.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.73% | 47.79% | -10.06% |
Dividends
ARKW vs. GILT - Dividend Comparison
ARKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, while GILT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | 1.66% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 13.05% | 2.05% | 0.00% | 2.29% |
GILT Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.91% | 5.52% | 5.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKW and GILT have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GILT has higher volatility (25.22%) compared to ARKW (10.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKW dropped -80.52% vs GILT's -99.94%.
GILT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKW and GILT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer