PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARKQ vs. URA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARKQ vs. URA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKQ achieves a 17.47% return, which is significantly higher than URA's 12.47% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKQ has outperformed URA with an annualized return of 22.08%, while URA has yielded a comparatively lower 16.50% annualized return.


ARKQ

1D
4.08%
1M
1.98%
YTD
17.47%
6M
19.36%
1Y
64.14%
3Y*
34.41%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*
22.08%

URA

1D
5.58%
1M
-3.75%
YTD
12.47%
6M
12.83%
1Y
39.37%
3Y*
34.52%
5Y*
21.19%
10Y*
16.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKQ vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
17.47%48.81%33.88%40.70%-46.75%1.74%107.20%25.94%-7.89%52.26%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
12.47%67.18%-0.58%46.25%-11.32%57.57%41.33%-3.54%-22.11%19.36%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKQ and URA is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014

0.52

Over the past year, ARKQ and URA have become more correlated (0.75) than their long-term average of 0.52, meaning their price movements have been converging.

ARKQ vs. URA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ARKQ
URA

Industrials

39.0%
22.7%

Technology

34.2%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

13.8%

-

Communication Services

9.1%

-

Energy

1.7%
64.2%

Healthcare

1.1%

-

Utilities

1.0%
7.4%

Basic Materials

-

4.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

ARKQ
39.0%
URA
22.7%

Technology

ARKQ
34.2%
URA
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ARKQ
13.8%
URA

-

Communication Services

ARKQ
9.1%
URA

-

Energy

ARKQ
1.7%
URA
64.2%

Healthcare

ARKQ
1.1%
URA

-

Utilities

ARKQ
1.0%
URA
7.4%

Basic Materials

ARKQ

-

URA
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

ARKQ

-

URA

-

Financial Services

ARKQ

-

URA

-

Real Estate

ARKQ

-

URA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARKQ vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKQ
ARKQ Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ARKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

URA
URA Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKQ vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARKQURADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.16

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

1.26

+1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.22

2.78

+6.43

ARKQ vs. URA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARKQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the URA Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARKQ and URA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARKQ vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKQ drawdown since its inception was -59.89%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKQ and URA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARKQURADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.89%

-93.54%

+33.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.58%

-31.48%

+10.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.76%

-37.81%

+7.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.71%

-37.90%

-17.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.89%

-61.45%

+1.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.35%

-45.46%

+39.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.21%

-74.93%

+57.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.98%

14.19%

-7.21%

Volatility

ARKQ vs. URA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) is 13.37%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 18.71%. This indicates that ARKQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARKQURADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.37%

18.71%

-5.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.41%

40.22%

-13.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.76%

51.62%

-17.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.56%

43.93%

-11.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.01%

37.95%

-7.94%

ARKQ vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARKQ vs. URA - Dividend Comparison

ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than URA's 4.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
0.23%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.80%0.86%0.00%2.86%1.54%0.00%0.98%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
4.34%4.88%2.86%6.07%0.76%5.84%1.69%1.66%0.44%2.03%7.28%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARKQ and URA have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URA has higher volatility (18.71%) compared to ARKQ (13.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKQ dropped -59.89% vs URA's -93.54%.

On 10-year performance, ARKQ leads with 22.08% vs 16.50% for URA. On fees, URA is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, ARKQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ARKQ has performed better with a 22.08% return vs 16.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

URA is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKQ.

URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 0.23% for ARKQ.

ARKQ is categorized as Robotics, while URA is Uranium. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKQ and 0.69% for URA.

ARKQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARKQ and URA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer