ARKQ vs. URA
ARKQ (ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKQ is a Robotics fund actively managed by ARK, while URA is a Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. ARKQ is actively managed, while URA is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ARKQ returned 22.08%/yr vs 16.50%/yr for URA. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.
Performance
ARKQ vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKQ achieves a 17.47% return, which is significantly higher than URA's 12.47% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKQ has outperformed URA with an annualized return of 22.08%, while URA has yielded a comparatively lower 16.50% annualized return.
ARKQ
- 1D
- 4.08%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 17.47%
- 6M
- 19.36%
- 1Y
- 64.14%
- 3Y*
- 34.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.10%
- 10Y*
- 22.08%
URA
- 1D
- 5.58%
- 1M
- -3.75%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 6M
- 12.83%
- 1Y
- 39.37%
- 3Y*
- 34.52%
- 5Y*
- 21.19%
- 10Y*
- 16.50%
ARKQ vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 17.47% | 48.81% | 33.88% | 40.70% | -46.75% | 1.74% | 107.20% | 25.94% | -7.89% | 52.26% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 12.47% | 67.18% | -0.58% | 46.25% | -11.32% | 57.57% | 41.33% | -3.54% | -22.11% | 19.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKQ and URA is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014 | 0.52 |
Over the past year, ARKQ and URA have become more correlated (0.75) than their long-term average of 0.52, meaning their price movements have been converging.
ARKQ vs. URA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARKQ
URA
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
Healthcare
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
ARKQ
URA
Technology
ARKQ
URA
Consumer Cyclical
ARKQ
URA
-
Communication Services
ARKQ
URA
-
Energy
ARKQ
URA
Healthcare
ARKQ
URA
-
Utilities
ARKQ
URA
Basic Materials
ARKQ
-
URA
Consumer Defensive
ARKQ
-
URA
-
Financial Services
ARKQ
-
URA
-
Real Estate
ARKQ
-
URA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKQ vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank
ARKQ
URA
ARKQ vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKQ | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.16 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 1.26 | +1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.22 | 2.78 | +6.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKQ vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKQ drawdown since its inception was -59.89%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKQ and URA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKQ | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.89% | -93.54% | +33.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.58% | -31.48% | +10.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.76% | -37.81% | +7.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.71% | -37.90% | -17.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.89% | -61.45% | +1.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.35% | -45.46% | +39.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.21% | -74.93% | +57.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.98% | 14.19% | -7.21% |
Volatility
ARKQ vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) is 13.37%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 18.71%. This indicates that ARKQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKQ | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.37% | 18.71% | -5.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.41% | 40.22% | -13.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.76% | 51.62% | -17.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.56% | 43.93% | -11.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.01% | 37.95% | -7.94% |
ARKQ vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKQ vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than URA's 4.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 0.23% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 2.86% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.98% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.34% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKQ and URA have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URA has higher volatility (18.71%) compared to ARKQ (13.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKQ dropped -59.89% vs URA's -93.54%.
On 10-year performance, ARKQ leads with 22.08% vs 16.50% for URA. On fees, URA is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, ARKQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ARKQ has performed better with a 22.08% return vs 16.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
URA is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKQ.
URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 0.23% for ARKQ.
ARKQ is categorized as Robotics, while URA is Uranium. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKQ and 0.69% for URA.
ARKQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKQ and URA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer