ARKQ vs. RBIL
ARKQ (ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKQ is a Robotics fund actively managed by ARK, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. ARKQ is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, ARKQ returned 73.83% vs 4.60% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. ARKQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
ARKQ vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKQ achieves a 21.70% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.67% return.
ARKQ
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 9.53%
- YTD
- 21.70%
- 6M
- 21.88%
- 1Y
- 73.83%
- 3Y*
- 39.06%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- 22.42%
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 2.67%
- 6M
- 2.74%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKQ vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 21.70% | 57.90% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.67% | 2.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKQ and RBIL is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKQ vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
ARKQ
RBIL
ARKQ vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARKQ | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 2.41 | -1.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 17.11 | -13.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.92 | 71.11 | -60.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARKQ | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 5.06 | -2.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 4.24 | -3.58 |
Drawdowns
ARKQ vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKQ drawdown since its inception was -59.89%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKQ and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKQ | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.89% | -0.50% | -59.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.58% | -0.27% | -20.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.98% | -0.03% | -2.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.23% | -0.06% | -17.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.79% | 0.06% | +6.73% |
Volatility
ARKQ vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) has a higher volatility of 10.40% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that ARKQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKQ | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.40% | 0.30% | +10.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.44% | 0.79% | +23.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.48% | 0.92% | +31.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.22% | 1.05% | +31.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.83% | 1.05% | +28.78% |
ARKQ vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKQ vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than RBIL's 4.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 0.22% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 2.86% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.98% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.60% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKQ and RBIL have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKQ has higher volatility (10.40%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKQ dropped -59.89% vs RBIL's -0.50%.
On 1-year performance, ARKQ leads with 73.83% vs 4.60% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ARKQ has performed better with a 73.83% return vs 4.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKQ.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 0.22% for ARKQ.
ARKQ is categorized as Robotics, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: ARK and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKQ and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.06 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKQ and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer