ARKF vs. QSOL
ARKF (ARK Fintech Innovation ETF) and QSOL (Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKF is a Blockchain fund actively managed by ARK, while QSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return. ARKF is actively managed, while QSOL is passively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QSOL.
Performance
ARKF vs. QSOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKF achieves a -15.24% return, which is significantly higher than QSOL's -43.88% return.
ARKF
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- -15.24%
- 6M
- -20.31%
- 1Y
- -3.73%
- 3Y*
- 26.44%
- 5Y*
- -3.98%
- 10Y*
- —
QSOL
- 1D
- -4.06%
- 1M
- -20.08%
- YTD
- -43.88%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKF vs. QSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF | -15.24% | -0.97% |
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | -43.88% | -0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKF and QSOL is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKF vs. QSOL — Risk / Return Rank
ARKF
QSOL
ARKF vs. QSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) and Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARKF | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.18 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARKF | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | -1.02 | +1.27 |
Drawdowns
ARKF vs. QSOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKF drawdown since its inception was -78.63%, which is greater than QSOL's maximum drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKF and QSOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKF | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.63% | -52.82% | -25.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.47% | -52.82% | +16.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.96% | -32.16% | -2.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.31% | — | — |
Volatility
ARKF vs. QSOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKF | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.25% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.66% | 70.49% | -36.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.79% | 70.49% | -27.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.76% | 70.49% | -30.73% |
ARKF vs. QSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QSOL's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKF vs. QSOL - Dividend Comparison
ARKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than QSOL's 0.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF | 0.11% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 1.25% |
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKF and QSOL have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKF.
QSOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.21%, compared with 0.11% for ARKF.
ARKF is categorized as Blockchain, while QSOL is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKF and 0.25% for QSOL.
Find the right allocation for ARKF and QSOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer