ARKD vs. ETCG
ARKD (ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF) and ETCG (Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ARKD is actively managed, while ETCG is passively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARKD charges 0.90%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for ETCG.
Performance
ARKD vs. ETCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARKD
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- 6M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETCG
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- 6M
- -44.00%
- YTD
- -38.91%
- 1Y
- -57.37%
- 3Y*
- -18.02%
- 5Y*
- -36.08%
- 10Y*
- —
ARKD vs. ETCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARKD ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF | 0.21% |
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) | -38.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKD and ETCG is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKD vs. ETCG — Risk / Return Rank
ARKD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ETCG
ARKD vs. ETCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF (ARKD) and Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKD | ETCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.84 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.80 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.14 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKD vs. ETCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKD drawdown since its inception was -14.03%, smaller than the maximum ETCG drawdown of -96.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKD and ETCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKD | ETCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.03% | -96.59% | +82.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -69.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -79.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -92.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.08% | -95.58% | +92.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.76% | -82.78% | +77.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 48.37% | — |
Volatility
ARKD vs. ETCG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKD | ETCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 36.08% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.15% | 61.85% | -41.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 92.04% | -71.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 114.70% | -94.55% |
ARKD vs. ETCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than ETCG's 2.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKD vs. ETCG - Dividend Comparison
Neither ARKD nor ETCG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKD and ETCG have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARKD is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARKD is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETCG.
ARKD and ETCG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: ARK and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for ARKD and 2.50% for ETCG.
Find the right allocation for ARKD and ETCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer