ARKB vs. ZCSH
ARKB (ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF) and ZCSH (Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)) are both Cryptocurrency funds - ARKB tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant while ZCSH tracks the Zcash (ZEC). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ARKB returned -43.47% vs 681.82% for ZCSH. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARKB charges 0.21%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for ZCSH.
Performance
ARKB vs. ZCSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKB achieves a -31.61% return, which is significantly lower than ZCSH's -17.94% return.
ARKB
- 1D
- -3.97%
- 1M
- -20.99%
- YTD
- -31.61%
- 6M
- -31.45%
- 1Y
- -43.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZCSH
- 1D
- -5.84%
- 1M
- -45.29%
- YTD
- -17.94%
- 6M
- -16.23%
- 1Y
- 681.82%
- 3Y*
- 132.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKB vs. ZCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ARKB ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF | -31.61% | -6.59% | 86.54% |
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | -17.94% | 446.78% | 139.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKB and ZCSH is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKB vs. ZCSH — Risk / Return Rank
ARKB
ZCSH
ARKB vs. ZCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKB | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.42 | -0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 9.89 | -10.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | 18.63 | -20.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKB vs. ZCSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKB drawdown since its inception was -52.37%, smaller than the maximum ZCSH drawdown of -93.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKB and ZCSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKB | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.37% | -93.73% | +41.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.37% | -69.62% | +17.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -71.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.37% | -51.05% | -1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.93% | -73.99% | +57.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.72% | 36.86% | -6.14% |
Volatility
ARKB vs. ZCSH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) is 13.35%, while Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) has a volatility of 64.43%. This indicates that ARKB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKB | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.35% | 64.43% | -51.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.46% | 107.10% | -72.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.28% | 174.35% | -130.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.07% | 138.31% | -88.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.07% | 138.31% | -88.24% |
ARKB vs. ZCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKB has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than ZCSH's 2.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKB vs. ZCSH - Dividend Comparison
Neither ARKB nor ZCSH has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKB and ZCSH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZCSH has higher volatility (64.43%) compared to ARKB (13.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKB dropped -52.37% vs ZCSH's -93.73%.
On 1-year performance, ZCSH leads with 681.82% vs -43.47% for ARKB. On fees, ARKB is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, ARKB has been the lower-risk option at 13.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ZCSH has performed better with a 681.82% return vs -43.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ARKB is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.
ARKB and ZCSH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
ARKB tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while ZCSH tracks Zcash (ZEC). They also come from different issuers: ARK and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for ARKB and 2.50% for ZCSH.
ZCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.95 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKB and ZCSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer