ARKB vs. IBIT
ARKB (ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF ) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, from ARK and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ARKB returned -35.86% vs -35.90% for IBIT. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ARKB charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
ARKB vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ARKB having a -23.24% return and IBIT slightly lower at -23.36%.
ARKB
- 1D
- -5.99%
- 1M
- -14.34%
- YTD
- -23.24%
- 6M
- -26.34%
- 1Y
- -35.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIT
- 1D
- -6.03%
- 1M
- -14.44%
- YTD
- -23.36%
- 6M
- -26.36%
- 1Y
- -35.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKB vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ARKB ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF | -23.24% | -6.59% | 99.47% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -23.36% | -6.41% | 99.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKB and IBIT is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 1.00 |
The correlation between ARKB and IBIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKB vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
ARKB
IBIT
ARKB vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARKB | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | -0.83 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | -1.09 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | -0.73 | 0.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | -1.27 | 0.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARKB | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.83 | -0.83 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
ARKB vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKB drawdown since its inception was -49.30%, roughly equal to the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKB and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKB | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.30% | -49.36% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.30% | -49.36% | +0.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.55% | -46.63% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.94% | -15.96% | +0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.24% | 28.28% | -0.04% |
Volatility
ARKB vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) have volatilities of 9.72% and 9.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKB | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.72% | 9.76% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.70% | 34.85% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.46% | 43.65% | -0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.94% | 50.20% | -0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.94% | 50.20% | -0.26% |
ARKB vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKB has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ARKB vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
Neither ARKB nor IBIT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, ARKB and IBIT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IBIT has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to ARKB (9.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKB dropped -49.30% vs IBIT's -49.36%.
On 1-year performance, ARKB leads with -35.86% vs -35.90% for IBIT. On fees, ARKB is cheaper at 0.21% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ARKB has performed better with a -35.86% return vs -35.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ARKB is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.
ARKB and IBIT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Both ETFs track CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: ARK and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for ARKB and 0.25% for IBIT.
IBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.82 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKB and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer