ARKB vs. ILS
ARKB (ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF) and ILS (Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKB is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while ILS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Brookmont. ARKB is passively managed, while ILS is actively managed. Over the past year, ARKB returned -44.16% vs 7.63% for ILS. Their -0.12 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ARKB charges 0.21%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for ILS.
Performance
ARKB vs. ILS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKB achieves a -26.69% return, which is significantly lower than ILS's 3.55% return.
ARKB
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- 6M
- -16.05%
- YTD
- -26.69%
- 1Y
- -44.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.02%
ILS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 3.55%
- 1Y
- 7.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $32.37M | $33.70M | $41.78M | |
| $448.54K | $510.06K | $623.45K |
ARKB vs. ILS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ARKB ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF | -26.69% | 5.99% |
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF | 3.55% | 3.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKB and ILS is -0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2025 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKB vs. ILS — Risk / Return Rank
ARKB
ILS
ARKB vs. ILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKB | ILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.72 | -0.89 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 13.85 | -14.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | 51.98 | -53.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKB vs. ILS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKB drawdown since its inception was -53.33%, which is greater than ILS's maximum drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKB and ILS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKB | ILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.33% | -2.46% | -50.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.33% | -0.55% | -52.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.94% | 0.00% | -48.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.36% | -0.50% | -17.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.90% | 0.15% | +34.75% |
Volatility
ARKB vs. ILS - Volatility Comparison
ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) has a higher volatility of 8.21% compared to Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) at 0.41%. This indicates that ARKB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKB | ILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.21% | 0.41% | +7.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.98% | 1.46% | +31.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.25% | 2.46% | +41.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.36% | 3.64% | +45.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.36% | 3.64% | +45.72% |
ARKB vs. ILS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKB has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than ILS's 1.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKB vs. ILS - Dividend Comparison
ARKB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ILS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARKB ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF | 8.13% | 6.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKB and ILS have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKB has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to ILS (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKB dropped -53.33% vs ILS's -2.46%.
On 1-year performance, ILS leads with 7.63% vs -44.16% for ARKB. On fees, ARKB is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, ILS has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ILS has performed better with a 7.63% return vs -44.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ARKB is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for ILS.
ILS has the higher dividend yield at 8.13%, compared with 0.00% for ARKB.
ARKB is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ILS is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Brookmont. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for ARKB and 1.58% for ILS.
ILS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKB and ILS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer