PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARI vs. REFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ARI vs. REFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. (ARI) and Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARI achieves a 14.60% return, which is significantly higher than REFI's -2.68% return.


ARI

1D
1.03%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
14.60%
6M
13.46%
1Y
22.16%
3Y*
10.54%
5Y*
4.00%
10Y*
7.52%

REFI

1D
3.06%
1M
0.53%
YTD
-2.68%
6M
-4.63%
1Y
-6.81%
3Y*
3.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARI vs. REFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ARI
Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.
14.60%23.83%-16.51%24.46%-7.12%-3.65%
REFI
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
-2.68%-8.70%8.69%23.70%3.35%1.52%

Correlation

The correlation between ARI and REFI is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021

0.43

The correlation between ARI and REFI shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.53 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ARI:

$1.51B

REFI:

$245.99M

EPS

ARI:

$0.91

REFI:

$226.63

PE Ratio

ARI:

11.89

REFI:

0.05

PEG Ratio

ARI:

0.00

REFI:

0.00

PS Ratio

ARI:

2.54

REFI:

5.54

PB Ratio

ARI:

0.84

REFI:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARI:

$595.26M

REFI:

$44.35M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARI:

$429.14M

REFI:

$42.41M

EBITDA (TTM)

ARI:

$372.79M

REFI:

$8.16M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARI vs. REFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARI
ARI Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ARI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARI Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ARI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARI Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

REFI
REFI Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
REFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
REFI Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
REFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
REFI Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARI vs. REFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. (ARI) and Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARIREFIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

0.97

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

-0.46

+2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.97

-0.82

+5.79

ARI vs. REFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARI Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the REFI Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARI and REFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARI vs. REFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARI drawdown since its inception was -77.39%, which is greater than REFI's maximum drawdown of -26.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARI and REFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARIREFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.39%

-26.55%

-50.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.04%

-14.71%

+4.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.73%

-19.25%

-5.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.48%

-15.63%

+12.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.04%

-9.93%

+0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.47%

8.28%

-3.81%

Volatility

ARI vs. REFI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. (ARI) is 4.36%, while Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) has a volatility of 6.25%. This indicates that ARI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARIREFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

6.25%

-1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.69%

16.18%

-2.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.06%

23.78%

-4.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.73%

24.32%

+6.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.99%

24.32%

+19.67%

Dividends

ARI vs. REFI - Dividend Comparison

ARI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.23%, less than REFI's 16.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARI
Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.
9.23%10.33%13.86%11.93%13.01%10.64%12.98%10.06%11.04%9.97%11.07%10.33%
REFI
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
16.42%15.33%13.36%13.41%13.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ARI vs. REFI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. and Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
58.63M
0
(ARI) Total Revenue
(REFI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ARI and REFI have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REFI has higher volatility (6.25%) compared to ARI (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARI dropped -77.39% vs REFI's -26.55%.

ARI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARI and REFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer