PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARI vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARI vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. (ARI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARI achieves a 15.23% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 7.88% return. Over the past 10 years, ARI has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 7.52%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.80% annualized return.


ARI

1D
-1.00%
1M
-0.91%
YTD
15.23%
6M
12.74%
1Y
22.08%
3Y*
12.71%
5Y*
3.94%
10Y*
7.52%

QYLD

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.62%
YTD
7.88%
6M
9.97%
1Y
23.93%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
9.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARI vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARI
Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.
15.23%23.83%-16.51%24.46%-7.12%29.66%-29.03%21.15%-0.03%22.51%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
7.88%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%8.72%22.69%-3.07%18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ARI and QYLD is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013

0.33

The correlation between ARI and QYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARI vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARI
ARI Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ARI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ARI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARI vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. (ARI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARIQYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

2.80

-1.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.80

3.92

-2.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.63

-0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

4.84

-2.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.99

28.36

-23.37

ARI vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARI Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARI and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARIQYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

2.80

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.58

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.63

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.59

-0.38

Drawdowns

ARI vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARI drawdown since its inception was -77.39%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARI and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARIQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.39%

-24.75%

-52.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.04%

-4.97%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.73%

-19.06%

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.62%

-24.61%

-17.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.39%

-24.75%

-52.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.94%

-0.06%

-2.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.90%

-3.84%

-5.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.44%

0.85%

+3.59%

Volatility

ARI vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. (ARI) has a higher volatility of 3.89% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.85%. This indicates that ARI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARIQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

1.85%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.94%

7.12%

+6.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.95%

8.58%

+10.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.79%

14.70%

+16.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.99%

15.49%

+28.50%

Dividends

ARI vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

ARI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.18%, less than QYLD's 11.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARI
Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.
9.18%10.33%13.86%11.93%13.01%10.64%12.98%10.06%11.04%9.97%11.07%10.33%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.46%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARI and QYLD have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARI has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to QYLD (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARI dropped -77.39% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARI and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer