ARGT vs. ECH
ARGT (Global X MSCI Argentina ETF) and ECH (iShares MSCI Chile ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARGT is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Argentina 25/50, while ECH is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI Chile Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ARGT returned 17.46%/yr vs 4.25%/yr for ECH. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARGT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for ECH.
Performance
ARGT vs. ECH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARGT achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly higher than ECH's -1.19% return. Over the past 10 years, ARGT has outperformed ECH with an annualized return of 17.46%, while ECH has yielded a comparatively lower 4.25% annualized return.
ARGT
- 1D
- -3.12%
- 1M
- 5.42%
- YTD
- 3.65%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 5.86%
- 3Y*
- 33.61%
- 5Y*
- 26.82%
- 10Y*
- 17.46%
ECH
- 1D
- -1.65%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- -1.19%
- 6M
- 3.73%
- 1Y
- 29.60%
- 3Y*
- 14.12%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 4.25%
ARGT vs. ECH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARGT Global X MSCI Argentina ETF | 3.65% | 11.51% | 63.46% | 53.64% | 11.80% | 3.83% | 14.58% | 14.50% | -32.62% | 53.87% |
ECH iShares MSCI Chile ETF | -1.19% | 65.41% | -8.67% | 9.01% | 25.12% | -19.80% | -7.13% | -17.79% | -18.98% | 41.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARGT and ECH is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2011 | 0.52 |
The correlation between ARGT and ECH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
ARGT vs. ECH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARGT
ECH
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ARGT
ECH
Energy
ARGT
ECH
-
Financial Services
ARGT
ECH
Basic Materials
ARGT
ECH
Industrials
ARGT
ECH
Consumer Defensive
ARGT
ECH
Utilities
ARGT
ECH
Communication Services
ARGT
ECH
Real Estate
ARGT
ECH
Healthcare
ARGT
-
ECH
-
Technology
ARGT
-
ECH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARGT vs. ECH — Risk / Return Rank
ARGT
ECH
ARGT vs. ECH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) and iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARGT | ECH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.16 | 1.20 | -1.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.55 | 1.70 | -1.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.21 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 1.51 | -1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.57 | 3.82 | -3.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARGT | ECH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 | 1.20 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.40 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.16 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.05 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
ARGT vs. ECH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARGT drawdown since its inception was -61.68%, smaller than the maximum ECH drawdown of -74.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARGT and ECH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARGT | ECH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.68% | -74.08% | +12.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.97% | -19.65% | -3.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.46% | -25.59% | -2.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.14% | -26.06% | -9.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.68% | -66.89% | +5.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.96% | -26.58% | +18.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.05% | -37.52% | +15.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.20% | 7.76% | +3.44% |
Volatility
ARGT vs. ECH - Volatility Comparison
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) has a higher volatility of 10.43% compared to iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) at 7.72%. This indicates that ARGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARGT | ECH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.43% | 7.72% | +2.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.31% | 20.29% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.70% | 24.85% | +11.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.92% | 27.51% | +4.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.44% | 27.21% | +4.23% |
ARGT vs. ECH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARGT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ECH's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARGT vs. ECH - Dividend Comparison
ARGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than ECH's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARGT Global X MSCI Argentina ETF | 0.81% | 0.84% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 2.45% | 0.93% | 0.28% | 1.21% | 1.34% | 0.49% | 0.36% | 0.89% |
ECH iShares MSCI Chile ETF | 2.04% | 2.01% | 3.12% | 4.77% | 6.73% | 5.49% | 2.16% | 2.47% | 2.37% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARGT and ECH have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARGT has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to ECH (7.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARGT dropped -61.68% vs ECH's -74.08%.
On 10-year performance, ARGT leads with 17.46% vs 4.25% for ECH. On fees, ECH is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, ECH has been the lower-risk option at 7.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ARGT has performed better with a 17.46% return vs 4.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ECH is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ARGT.
ECH has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.81% for ARGT.
ARGT is categorized as Latin America Equities, while ECH is Foreign Large Cap Equities. ARGT tracks MSCI All Argentina 25/50, while ECH tracks MSCI Chile Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ARGT and 0.59% for ECH.
ECH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARGT and ECH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer