PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARES vs. CYBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ARES vs. CYBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ares Management Corporation (ARES) and CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ARES

1D
-4.07%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
-23.01%
6M
-26.26%
1Y
-23.41%
3Y*
13.92%
5Y*
18.72%
10Y*
29.90%

CYBR

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARES vs. CYBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
-23.01%-5.72%52.68%79.52%-12.75%77.75%37.37%110.13%-5.54%10.72%
CYBR
CyberArk Software Ltd.
-8.34%33.89%52.09%68.95%-25.18%7.23%38.61%57.24%79.13%-9.03%

Correlation

The correlation between ARES and CYBR is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2014

0.30

The correlation between ARES and CYBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

ARES:

$2.83

CYBR:

-$2.92

PS Ratio

ARES:

4.21

CYBR:

15.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARES:

$6.31B

CYBR:

$1.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARES:

$4.46B

CYBR:

$1.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

ARES:

$2.42B

CYBR:

$59.13M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARES vs. CYBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARES
ARES Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
ARES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARES Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARES Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
ARES Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARES Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

CYBR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARES vs. CYBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ares Management Corporation (ARES) and CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARESCYBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.92

ARES vs. CYBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARES vs. CYBR - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARESCYBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.42%

Volatility

ARES vs. CYBR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARESCYBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.74%

Dividends

ARES vs. CYBR - Dividend Comparison

ARES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%, while CYBR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
5.49%3.29%2.10%2.59%3.57%2.31%3.40%3.59%7.50%5.65%4.32%6.81%
CYBR
CyberArk Software Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ARES vs. CYBR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ares Management Corporation and CyberArk Software Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.53B
372.65M
(ARES) Total Revenue
(CYBR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ARES vs. CYBR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ares Management Corporation and CyberArk Software Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
96.1%
71.7%
Portfolio components
ARES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.47B and revenue of 1.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.1%.

CYBR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported a gross profit of 267.25M and revenue of 372.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.7%.

ARES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported an operating income of 364.95M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.

CYBR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported an operating income of 1.75M and revenue of 372.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.

ARES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported a net income of 142.59M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.

CYBR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported a net income of -17.11M and revenue of 372.65M, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ARES and CYBR have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARES and CYBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer