ARDC vs. SMH
ARDC (Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc.) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, ARDC returned 8.40%/yr vs 37.85%/yr for SMH. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ARDC vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARDC achieves a -0.83% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.73% return. Over the past 10 years, ARDC has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 8.40%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.85% annualized return.
ARDC
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- -0.83%
- 6M
- -0.53%
- 1Y
- -2.00%
- 3Y*
- 11.86%
- 5Y*
- 4.57%
- 10Y*
- 8.40%
SMH
- 1D
- -7.01%
- 1M
- 7.93%
- YTD
- 72.73%
- 6M
- 71.29%
- 1Y
- 138.23%
- 3Y*
- 62.28%
- 5Y*
- 38.18%
- 10Y*
- 37.85%
ARDC vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARDC Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. | -0.83% | -3.10% | 21.05% | 32.35% | -22.21% | 23.12% | 2.56% | 21.26% | -8.80% | 17.63% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.73% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARDC and SMH is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2012 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARDC vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
ARDC
SMH
ARDC vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARDC | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.58 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 9.31 | -9.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.26 | 33.88 | -34.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARDC vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARDC drawdown since its inception was -45.40%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARDC and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARDC | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.40% | -84.96% | +39.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.57% | -14.93% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.78% | -35.74% | +15.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.48% | -45.30% | +18.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.40% | -45.30% | -0.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.38% | -7.01% | -1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -41.01% | +34.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.62% | 4.10% | +3.52% |
Volatility
ARDC vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC) is 2.50%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 19.08%. This indicates that ARDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARDC | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.50% | 19.08% | -16.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.28% | 29.18% | -21.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.58% | 34.87% | -25.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.80% | 35.83% | -22.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 32.97% | -16.10% |
ARDC vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARDC has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARDC vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
ARDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.79%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARDC Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. | 10.79% | 10.19% | 9.33% | 9.85% | 10.31% | 7.16% | 8.40% | 8.40% | 9.35% | 7.58% | 8.45% | 10.51% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARDC and SMH have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (19.08%) compared to ARDC (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARDC dropped -45.40% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.99 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARDC and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer