PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARDC vs. FSCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ARDC vs. FSCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC) and FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARDC achieves a -1.78% return, which is significantly higher than FSCO's -18.38% return.


ARDC

1D
-1.19%
1M
0.41%
YTD
-1.78%
6M
-1.97%
1Y
-1.89%
3Y*
12.41%
5Y*
4.79%
10Y*
8.26%

FSCO

1D
-1.22%
1M
-5.26%
YTD
-18.38%
6M
-13.63%
1Y
-23.27%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARDC vs. FSCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ARDC
Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc.
-1.78%-3.10%21.05%32.35%-1.50%
FSCO
FS Credit Opportunities Corp.
-18.38%3.68%34.88%36.98%7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between ARDC and FSCO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2022

0.26

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARDC vs. FSCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARDC
ARDC Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ARDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARDC Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
ARDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARDC Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

FSCO
FSCO Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FSCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCO Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARDC vs. FSCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC) and FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARDCFSCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.85

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

-0.66

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.26

-1.38

+1.12

ARDC vs. FSCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARDC Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is higher than the FSCO Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARDC and FSCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARDCFSCODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

-0.86

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.57

-0.21

Drawdowns

ARDC vs. FSCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARDC drawdown since its inception was -45.40%, which is greater than FSCO's maximum drawdown of -35.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARDC and FSCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARDCFSCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.40%

-35.53%

-9.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.57%

-35.53%

+19.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.78%

-35.53%

+15.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.26%

-28.73%

+19.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.64%

-7.83%

+1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.36%

16.89%

-9.53%

Volatility

ARDC vs. FSCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC) is 2.83%, while FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that ARDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARDCFSCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

5.19%

-2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.14%

22.58%

-15.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.51%

27.07%

-17.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.80%

27.71%

-13.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.87%

27.71%

-10.84%

Dividends

ARDC vs. FSCO - Dividend Comparison

ARDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.80%, less than FSCO's 16.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARDC
Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc.
10.80%10.19%9.33%9.85%10.31%7.16%8.40%8.40%9.35%7.58%8.45%10.51%
FSCO
FS Credit Opportunities Corp.
16.15%12.65%10.47%11.26%1.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ARDC vs. FSCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. and FS Credit Opportunities Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00M15.00M20.00M25.00M20212022202320242025
24.48M
(ARDC) Total Revenue
(FSCO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ARDC and FSCO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSCO has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to ARDC (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARDC dropped -45.40% vs FSCO's -35.53%.

ARDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.20 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARDC and FSCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer