ARDC vs. FSCO
ARDC (Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc.) and FSCO (FS Credit Opportunities Corp.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 3 years, ARDC returned 12.41%/yr vs 15.11%/yr for FSCO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ARDC vs. FSCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARDC achieves a -1.78% return, which is significantly higher than FSCO's -18.38% return.
ARDC
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- -1.78%
- 6M
- -1.97%
- 1Y
- -1.89%
- 3Y*
- 12.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.79%
- 10Y*
- 8.26%
FSCO
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -5.26%
- YTD
- -18.38%
- 6M
- -13.63%
- 1Y
- -23.27%
- 3Y*
- 15.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARDC vs. FSCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARDC Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. | -1.78% | -3.10% | 21.05% | 32.35% | -1.50% |
FSCO FS Credit Opportunities Corp. | -18.38% | 3.68% | 34.88% | 36.98% | 7.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARDC and FSCO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2022 | 0.26 |
Fundamentals
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARDC vs. FSCO — Risk / Return Rank
ARDC
FSCO
ARDC vs. FSCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC) and FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARDC | FSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.85 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | -0.66 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.26 | -1.38 | +1.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARDC | FSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 | -0.86 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.57 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
ARDC vs. FSCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARDC drawdown since its inception was -45.40%, which is greater than FSCO's maximum drawdown of -35.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARDC and FSCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARDC | FSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.40% | -35.53% | -9.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.57% | -35.53% | +19.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.78% | -35.53% | +15.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.26% | -28.73% | +19.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.64% | -7.83% | +1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.36% | 16.89% | -9.53% |
Volatility
ARDC vs. FSCO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC) is 2.83%, while FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that ARDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARDC | FSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 5.19% | -2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.14% | 22.58% | -15.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.51% | 27.07% | -17.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.80% | 27.71% | -13.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 27.71% | -10.84% |
Dividends
ARDC vs. FSCO - Dividend Comparison
ARDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.80%, less than FSCO's 16.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARDC Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. | 10.80% | 10.19% | 9.33% | 9.85% | 10.31% | 7.16% | 8.40% | 8.40% | 9.35% | 7.58% | 8.45% | 10.51% |
FSCO FS Credit Opportunities Corp. | 16.15% | 12.65% | 10.47% | 11.26% | 1.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ARDC vs. FSCO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. and FS Credit Opportunities Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ARDC and FSCO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSCO has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to ARDC (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARDC dropped -45.40% vs FSCO's -35.53%.
ARDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.20 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARDC and FSCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer