ARCX vs. QTJL

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ARCX (Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ARCX returned -92.79% vs 13.53% for QTJL. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARCX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.

Performance

ARCX vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARCX achieves a -73.88% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 4.13% return.

ARCX

• 1D: -12.52%
• 1M: -34.86%
• 6M: -80.87%
• YTD: -73.88%
• 1Y: -92.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTJL

• 1D: -1.51%
• 1M: -2.95%
• 6M: 3.48%
• YTD: 4.13%
• 1Y: 13.53%
• 3Y*: 16.55%
• 5Y*: 9.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARCX vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ARCX Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF	-73.88%	-71.53%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	4.13%	11.59%

Correlation

The correlation between ARCX and QTJL is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025	0.49

The correlation between ARCX and QTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ARCX vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARCX

ARCX Risk / Return Rank: 2
ARCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
ARCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
ARCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
ARCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
ARCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 52
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 50
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARCX vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARCX	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.68	1.28	-1.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.73	1.83	-3.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.26	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	2.03	-3.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.26	10.11	-11.37

ARCX vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the QTJL Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARCX and QTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARCX vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARCX drawdown since its inception was -94.06%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCX and QTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARCX	QTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.06%	-33.40%	-60.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-94.06%	-6.68%	-87.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.43%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.06%	-3.17%	-90.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.07%	-7.77%	-59.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	73.54%	1.34%	+72.20%

Volatility

ARCX vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) has a higher volatility of 37.01% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 4.19%. This indicates that ARCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARCX	QTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	37.01%	4.19%	+32.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	91.85%	8.42%	+83.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	138.07%	10.63%	+127.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	140.48%	20.34%	+120.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	140.48%	20.27%	+120.21%

ARCX vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARCX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARCX vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARCX nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARCX and QTJL in my portfolio?

ARCX and QTJL have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARCX or QTJL?

ARCX has higher volatility (37.01%) compared to QTJL (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARCX dropped -94.06% vs QTJL's -33.40%.

Which ETF is better, ARCX or QTJL?

On 1-year performance, QTJL leads with 13.53% vs -92.79% for ARCX. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ARCX or QTJL?

Over the 1-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 13.53% return vs -92.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARCX or QTJL?

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for ARCX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARCX or QTJL?

ARCX and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ARCX and QTJL?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for ARCX and 0.79% for QTJL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.