ARCX vs. QTJL
ARCX (Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ARCX returned -85.69% vs 18.59% for QTJL. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARCX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
ARCX vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARCX achieves a -62.89% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 7.38% return.
ARCX
- 1D
- -6.89%
- 1M
- -35.81%
- YTD
- -62.89%
- 6M
- -69.07%
- 1Y
- -85.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTJL
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 7.38%
- 6M
- 6.82%
- 1Y
- 18.59%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARCX vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ARCX Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF | -62.89% | -71.53% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 7.38% | 11.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARCX and QTJL is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARCX vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
ARCX
QTJL
ARCX vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARCX | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.39 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 2.79 | -3.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | 14.72 | -15.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARCX vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARCX drawdown since its inception was -91.99%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCX and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARCX | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.99% | -33.40% | -58.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.99% | -6.68% | -85.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.56% | -0.04% | -91.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.48% | -7.85% | -57.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 69.76% | 1.27% | +68.49% |
Volatility
ARCX vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) has a higher volatility of 46.44% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 0.60%. This indicates that ARCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARCX | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 46.44% | 0.60% | +45.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 89.89% | 7.42% | +82.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 138.27% | 9.88% | +128.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 140.75% | 20.31% | +120.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 140.75% | 20.31% | +120.44% |
ARCX vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARCX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARCX vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither ARCX nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ARCX and QTJL have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARCX has higher volatility (46.44%) compared to QTJL (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARCX dropped -91.99% vs QTJL's -33.40%.
On 1-year performance, QTJL leads with 18.59% vs -85.69% for ARCX. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 18.59% return vs -85.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for ARCX.
ARCX and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for ARCX and 0.79% for QTJL.
QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARCX and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer