ARCX vs. QTAP

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

ARCX (Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ARCX returned -86.80% vs 21.61% for QTAP. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ARCX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.

Performance

ARCX vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARCX achieves a -67.11% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 15.59% return.

ARCX

• 1D: -4.43%
• 1M: -13.26%
• 6M: -59.31%
• YTD: -67.11%
• 1Y: -86.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -87.19%

QTAP

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 1.24%
• 6M: 15.02%
• YTD: 15.59%
• 1Y: 21.61%
• 3Y*: 20.08%
• 5Y*: 12.49%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ARCX Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF	$187.23K	$373.70K	$915.80K
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	$241.79K	$219.11K	$201.05K

ARCX vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ARCX Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF	-67.11%	-71.53%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	15.59%	8.96%

Correlation

The correlation between ARCX and QTAP is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025	0.48

Return for Risk

ARCX vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARCX

ARCX Risk / Return Rank: 3
ARCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
ARCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
ARCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
ARCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
ARCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 97
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARCX vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARCX	QTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.62	3.29	-3.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.11	5.33	-6.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	1.78	-0.90
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.93	7.72	-8.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	37.02	-38.23

ARCX vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARCX and QTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARCX vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARCX drawdown since its inception was -94.32%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCX and QTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARCX	QTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.32%	-29.44%	-64.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-93.63%	-2.81%	-90.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-92.52%	0.00%	-92.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.32%	-4.90%	-63.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	71.56%	0.59%	+70.97%

Volatility

ARCX vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) has a higher volatility of 52.42% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 2.79%. This indicates that ARCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARCX	QTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	52.42%	2.79%	+49.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	99.72%	5.78%	+93.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	140.37%	6.60%	+133.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	145.28%	18.94%	+126.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	145.28%	18.55%	+126.73%

ARCX vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARCX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARCX vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARCX nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARCX and QTAP in my portfolio?

ARCX and QTAP have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARCX or QTAP?

ARCX has higher volatility (52.42%) compared to QTAP (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARCX dropped -94.32% vs QTAP's -29.44%.

Which ETF is better, ARCX or QTAP?

On 1-year performance, QTAP leads with 21.61% vs -86.80% for ARCX. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ARCX or QTAP?

Over the 1-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 21.61% return vs -86.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARCX or QTAP?

QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for ARCX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARCX or QTAP?

ARCX and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ARCX and QTAP?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for ARCX and 0.79% for QTAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.