ARCX vs. NRGU

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ARCX (Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF) and NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. ARCX is actively managed, while NRGU is passively managed. Over the past year, ARCX returned -92.79% vs 119.26% for NRGU. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. ARCX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for NRGU.

Performance

ARCX vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARCX achieves a -73.88% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 118.00% return.

ARCX

• 1D: -12.52%
• 1M: -34.86%
• 6M: -80.87%
• YTD: -73.88%
• 1Y: -92.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NRGU

• 1D: 3.84%
• 1M: 18.77%
• 6M: 86.19%
• YTD: 118.00%
• 1Y: 119.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARCX vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ARCX Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF	-73.88%	-71.53%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	118.00%	11.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ARCX and NRGU is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

ARCX vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARCX

ARCX Risk / Return Rank: 2
ARCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
ARCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
ARCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
ARCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
ARCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 55
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 50
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARCX vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARCX	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.68	1.56	-2.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.73	2.08	-3.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.26	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	2.73	-3.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.26	6.13	-7.39

ARCX vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARCX and NRGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARCX vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARCX drawdown since its inception was -94.06%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCX and NRGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARCX	NRGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.06%	-57.50%	-36.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-94.06%	-43.89%	-50.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.06%	-24.81%	-69.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.07%	-26.06%	-41.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	73.54%	19.53%	+54.01%

Volatility

ARCX vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) has a higher volatility of 37.01% compared to MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) at 23.48%. This indicates that ARCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARCX	NRGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	37.01%	23.48%	+13.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	91.85%	63.97%	+27.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	138.07%	76.98%	+61.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	140.48%	89.07%	+51.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	140.48%	89.07%	+51.41%

ARCX vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARCX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARCX vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARCX nor NRGU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARCX and NRGU in my portfolio?

ARCX and NRGU have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARCX or NRGU?

ARCX has higher volatility (37.01%) compared to NRGU (23.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARCX dropped -94.06% vs NRGU's -57.50%.

Which ETF is better, ARCX or NRGU?

On 1-year performance, NRGU leads with 119.26% vs -92.79% for ARCX. On fees, NRGU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, NRGU has been the lower-risk option at 23.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ARCX or NRGU?

Over the 1-year period, NRGU has performed better with a 119.26% return vs -92.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARCX or NRGU?

NRGU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for ARCX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARCX or NRGU?

ARCX and NRGU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ARCX and NRGU?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for ARCX and 0.95% for NRGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NRGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.