ARCX vs. NEBX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ARCX (Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF) and NEBX (Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.

Performance

ARCX vs. NEBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) and Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NEBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARCX achieves a -73.88% return, which is significantly lower than NEBX's 117.23% return.

ARCX

• 1D: -12.52%
• 1M: -34.86%
• 6M: -80.87%
• YTD: -73.88%
• 1Y: -92.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NEBX

• 1D: -27.49%
• 1M: -63.44%
• 6M: 44.14%
• YTD: 117.23%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARCX vs. NEBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ARCX Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF	-73.88%	-39.15%
NEBX Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF	117.23%	-37.72%

Correlation

The correlation between ARCX and NEBX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

ARCX vs. NEBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARCX

ARCX Risk / Return Rank: 2
ARCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
ARCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
ARCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
ARCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
ARCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

NEBX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARCX vs. NEBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) and Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NEBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARCX	NEBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.68	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.73	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.26	—	—

Drawdowns

ARCX vs. NEBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARCX drawdown since its inception was -94.06%, which is greater than NEBX's maximum drawdown of -77.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCX and NEBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARCX	NEBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.06%	-77.97%	-16.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-94.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.06%	-68.44%	-25.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.07%	-39.30%	-27.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	73.54%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ARCX	NEBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	37.01%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	91.85%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	138.07%	197.31%	-59.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	140.48%	197.31%	-56.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	140.48%	197.31%	-56.83%

ARCX vs. NEBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ARCX and NEBX have an expense ratio of 1.30%.

Dividends

ARCX vs. NEBX - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARCX nor NEBX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARCX and NEBX in my portfolio?

ARCX and NEBX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ARCX or NEBX?

Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARCX or NEBX?

ARCX and NEBX have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARCX or NEBX?

ARCX and NEBX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.