PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARCM vs. CSHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ARCM vs. CSHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow Reserve Capital Management ETF (ARCM) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ARCM vs. CSHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ARCM
Arrow Reserve Capital Management ETF
0.71%4.11%5.24%4.72%1.06%
CSHI
Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF
1.30%5.05%5.66%6.21%1.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARCM achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than CSHI's 1.30% return.


ARCM

1D
0.03%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.71%
6M
1.67%
1Y
3.77%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
3.03%
10Y*

CSHI

1D
0.18%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.30%
6M
2.57%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
5.49%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ARCM vs. CSHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARCM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHI's 0.38% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ARCM vs. CSHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARCM
ARCM Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ARCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARCM Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ARCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARCM Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

CSHI
CSHI Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CSHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CSHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARCM vs. CSHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Reserve Capital Management ETF (ARCM) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARCMCSHIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

8.72

2.71

+6.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

18.04

4.01

+14.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

4.62

2.01

+2.60

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

30.46

3.21

+27.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

243.95

28.78

+215.17

ARCM vs. CSHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARCM Sharpe Ratio is 8.72, which is higher than the CSHI Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARCM and CSHI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARCMCSHIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.72

2.71

+6.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

4.10

-4.09

Correlation

The correlation between ARCM and CSHI is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ARCM vs. CSHI - Dividend Comparison

ARCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than CSHI's 4.98% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARCM
Arrow Reserve Capital Management ETF
3.88%4.13%4.87%4.26%0.90%0.02%0.84%2.32%1.91%0.62%
CSHI
Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF
4.98%5.11%5.72%6.15%1.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ARCM vs. CSHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARCM drawdown since its inception was -96.02%, which is greater than CSHI's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCM and CSHI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ARCMCSHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.02%

-1.69%

-94.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.12%

-1.69%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-3.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-0.03%

-0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

0.19%

-0.17%

Volatility

ARCM vs. CSHI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Arrow Reserve Capital Management ETF (ARCM) is 0.18%, while Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) has a volatility of 0.39%. This indicates that ARCM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ARCMCSHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.18%

0.39%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.31%

0.68%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43%

2.01%

-1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.02%

1.35%

+1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

835.19%

1.35%

+833.84%