ARCC vs. XLV
ARCC (Ares Capital Corporation) is a stock, while XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, ARCC returned 13.20%/yr vs 9.81%/yr for XLV. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ARCC vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARCC achieves a -2.20% return, which is significantly lower than XLV's -0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, ARCC has outperformed XLV with an annualized return of 13.20%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.81% annualized return.
ARCC
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- -2.20%
- 6M
- -2.87%
- 1Y
- -3.87%
- 3Y*
- 10.27%
- 5Y*
- 9.04%
- 10Y*
- 13.20%
XLV
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 4.90%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
ARCC vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | -2.20% | 1.07% | 19.78% | 20.03% | -3.84% | 36.14% | 0.86% | 31.30% | 8.81% | 4.50% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.23% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARCC and XLV is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2004 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ARCC and XLV has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARCC vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
ARCC
XLV
ARCC vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARCC | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.17 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 1.38 | -1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.47 | 3.31 | -3.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARCC vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARCC drawdown since its inception was -79.36%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCC and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARCC | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.36% | -39.17% | -40.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.35% | -10.47% | -8.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.35% | -17.11% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.76% | -17.11% | -4.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.77% | -28.40% | -28.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.98% | -3.59% | -7.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.10% | -7.12% | -1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.68% | 4.37% | +6.31% |
Volatility
ARCC vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is 3.72%, while State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that ARCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARCC | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 4.90% | -1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.83% | 10.60% | +4.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.48% | 15.03% | +3.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.96% | 14.75% | +5.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.58% | 16.58% | +9.00% |
Dividends
ARCC vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
ARCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.97%, more than XLV's 1.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | 7.48% | 9.49% | 8.77% | 9.59% | 10.12% | 7.65% | 9.47% | 9.01% | 9.88% | 9.67% | 9.22% | 11.02% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.63% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARCC and XLV have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLV has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to ARCC (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARCC dropped -79.36% vs XLV's -39.17%.
XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARCC and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer