PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARCC vs. TROW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ARCC vs. TROW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARCC achieves a -2.20% return, which is significantly lower than TROW's 8.69% return. Over the past 10 years, ARCC has outperformed TROW with an annualized return of 13.20%, while TROW has yielded a comparatively lower 8.25% annualized return.


ARCC

1D
1.00%
1M
2.56%
YTD
-2.20%
6M
-2.87%
1Y
-5.06%
3Y*
10.27%
5Y*
9.04%
10Y*
13.20%

TROW

1D
1.27%
1M
6.44%
YTD
8.69%
6M
7.38%
1Y
22.18%
3Y*
4.23%
5Y*
-6.62%
10Y*
8.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARCC vs. TROW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
-2.20%1.07%19.78%20.03%-3.84%36.14%0.86%31.30%8.81%4.50%
TROW
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
8.69%-4.67%9.68%3.35%-42.24%34.91%28.11%35.61%-9.75%43.38%

Correlation

The correlation between ARCC and TROW is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2004

0.50

The correlation between ARCC and TROW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ARCC:

$13.83B

TROW:

$23.86B

EPS

ARCC:

$1.63

TROW:

$9.80

PE Ratio

ARCC:

11.81

TROW:

11.19

PS Ratio

ARCC:

5.16

TROW:

3.26

PB Ratio

ARCC:

0.98

TROW:

2.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARCC:

$2.63B

TROW:

$7.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARCC:

$1.86B

TROW:

$3.66B

EBITDA (TTM)

ARCC:

$2.05B

TROW:

$2.87B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARCC vs. TROW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARCC
ARCC Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ARCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARCC Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
ARCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARCC Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

TROW
TROW Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TROW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TROW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
TROW Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TROW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TROW Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARCC vs. TROW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARCCTROWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.18

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.26

1.13

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.47

2.77

-3.25

ARCC vs. TROW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARCC Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the TROW Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARCC and TROW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARCC vs. TROW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARCC drawdown since its inception was -79.36%, which is greater than TROW's maximum drawdown of -67.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCC and TROW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARCCTROWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.36%

-67.43%

-11.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.35%

-19.76%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

-34.05%

+14.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.76%

-58.16%

+36.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.77%

-58.16%

+1.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.98%

-39.77%

+28.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.10%

-16.68%

+7.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.68%

8.02%

+2.66%

Volatility

ARCC vs. TROW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is 3.72%, while T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that ARCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TROW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARCCTROWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

4.34%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.83%

17.09%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.48%

23.79%

-5.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.96%

30.47%

-10.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.58%

30.00%

-4.42%

Dividends

ARCC vs. TROW - Dividend Comparison

ARCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.97%, more than TROW's 4.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
9.97%9.49%8.77%9.59%10.12%7.65%9.47%9.01%9.88%9.67%9.22%11.02%
TROW
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
4.66%4.96%4.39%4.53%4.40%3.72%2.38%2.50%3.03%2.17%2.87%5.71%

Financials

ARCC vs. TROW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ares Capital Corporation and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
763.00M
1.86B
(ARCC) Total Revenue
(TROW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ARCC vs. TROW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ares Capital Corporation and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
72.1%
0
Portfolio components
ARCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported a gross profit of 550.00M and revenue of 763.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.1%.

TROW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ARCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported an operating income of 404.00M and revenue of 763.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.0%.

TROW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 680.50M and revenue of 1.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.7%.

ARCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported a net income of 92.00M and revenue of 763.00M, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.

TROW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. reported a net income of 562.00M and revenue of 1.86B, resulting in a net margin of 30.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ARCC and TROW have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TROW has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to ARCC (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARCC dropped -79.36% vs TROW's -67.43%.

TROW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARCC and TROW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer