AQWA.L vs. GLGG.L
AQWA.L (Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF USD Acc) and GLGG.L (L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF) are both Water Equities funds - AQWA.L tracks the Solactive Global Clean Water Industry v2 Index while GLGG.L tracks the S&P Global Water TR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AQWA.L returned 9.63%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for GLGG.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AQWA.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GLGG.L.
Performance
AQWA.L vs. GLGG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AQWA.L is traded in USD, while GLGG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GLGG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AQWA.L achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly lower than GLGG.L's 4.35% return.
AQWA.L
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- 6M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 2.14%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLGG.L
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 4.35%
- 1Y
- 8.22%
- 3Y*
- 10.82%
- 5Y*
- 5.93%
- 10Y*
- —
AQWA.L vs. GLGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AQWA.L Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF USD Acc | 1.75% | 12.96% | 5.98% | 25.16% | -19.37% | 1.47% |
GLGG.L L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF | 4.35% | 15.95% | 3.98% | 20.62% | -17.38% | 3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between AQWA.L and GLGG.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2021 | 0.83 |
The correlation between AQWA.L and GLGG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AQWA.L vs. GLGG.L — Risk / Return Rank
AQWA.L
GLGG.L
AQWA.L vs. GLGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF USD Acc (AQWA.L) and L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (GLGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AQWA.L | GLGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.10 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | 0.64 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.69 | 1.49 | -0.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AQWA.L vs. GLGG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AQWA.L drawdown since its inception was -28.61%, smaller than the maximum GLGG.L drawdown of -41.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQWA.L and GLGG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AQWA.L | GLGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.61% | -41.32% | +12.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.86% | -12.72% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.35% | -19.46% | +2.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.72% | -6.64% | -1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.25% | -10.36% | +1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.56% | 5.50% | +0.06% |
Volatility
AQWA.L vs. GLGG.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF USD Acc (AQWA.L) and L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (GLGG.L) have volatilities of 4.21% and 4.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AQWA.L | GLGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 4.36% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.67% | 12.45% | -0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.91% | 15.35% | -0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 22.06% | -4.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 23.52% | -6.20% |
AQWA.L vs. GLGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AQWA.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GLGG.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
AQWA.L vs. GLGG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AQWA.L nor GLGG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AQWA.L and GLGG.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLGG.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLGG.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for AQWA.L.
AQWA.L tracks Solactive Global Clean Water Industry v2 Index, while GLGG.L tracks S&P Global Water TR. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for AQWA.L and 0.49% for GLGG.L.
Find the right allocation for AQWA.L and GLGG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer