AQMNX vs. QMHNX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AQMNX (AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N) and QMHNX (AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N) are both Systematic Trend funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, AQMNX returned 4.80%/yr vs 5.60%/yr for QMHNX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AQMNX charges 2.97%/yr vs 4.12%/yr for QMHNX.

Performance

AQMNX vs. QMHNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AQMNX achieves a 13.50% return, which is significantly lower than QMHNX's 18.97% return. Over the past 10 years, AQMNX has underperformed QMHNX with an annualized return of 4.80%, while QMHNX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.60% annualized return.

AQMNX

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: 1.70%
• YTD: 13.50%
• 6M: 15.37%
• 1Y: 25.38%
• 3Y*: 12.45%
• 5Y*: 12.57%
• 10Y*: 4.80%

QMHNX

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 2.34%
• YTD: 18.97%
• 6M: 22.10%
• 1Y: 34.84%
• 3Y*: 16.46%
• 5Y*: 16.21%
• 10Y*: 5.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AQMNX vs. QMHNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AQMNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N	13.50%	14.38%	7.96%	1.79%	35.16%	-1.31%	-0.62%	1.57%	-9.12%	-1.19%
QMHNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N	18.97%	19.65%	10.48%	-0.40%	49.64%	-2.30%	-0.85%	1.55%	-14.59%	-2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between AQMNX and QMHNX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014	0.99

The correlation between AQMNX and QMHNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AQMNX vs. QMHNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AQMNX

AQMNX Risk / Return Rank: 90
AQMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
AQMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
AQMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
AQMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AQMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

QMHNX

QMHNX Risk / Return Rank: 85
QMHNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
QMHNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
QMHNX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
QMHNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
QMHNX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AQMNX vs. QMHNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AQMNX	QMHNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.98	2.77	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.04	3.57	+0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.47	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.19	7.34	+0.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.01	21.53	+4.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AQMNX vs. QMHNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AQMNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is comparable to the QMHNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AQMNX and QMHNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AQMNX	QMHNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.98	2.77	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.09	0.94	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.36	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.37	+0.02

Drawdowns

AQMNX vs. QMHNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AQMNX drawdown since its inception was -27.50%, smaller than the maximum QMHNX drawdown of -40.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQMNX and QMHNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AQMNX	QMHNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.50%	-40.29%	+12.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.15%	-4.81%	+1.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.70%	-19.23%	+5.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.70%	-19.23%	+5.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.13%	-35.34%	+11.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.40%	-18.28%	+7.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.99%	1.63%	-0.64%

Volatility

AQMNX vs. QMHNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX) is 2.63%, while AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that AQMNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMHNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AQMNX	QMHNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.63%	3.78%	-1.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.66%	9.63%	-2.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.64%	12.74%	-4.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.55%	17.31%	-5.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.33%	15.47%	-5.14%

AQMNX vs. QMHNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AQMNX has a 2.97% expense ratio, which is lower than QMHNX's 4.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

AQMNX vs. QMHNX - Dividend Comparison

AQMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than QMHNX's 1.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AQMNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N	1.81%	2.05%	3.61%	8.15%	12.59%	6.59%	4.17%	2.92%	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	6.30%
QMHNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N	1.59%	1.89%	2.09%	7.36%	8.75%	10.64%	7.79%	3.80%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	7.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AQMNX and QMHNX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, AQMNX and QMHNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AQMNX or QMHNX?

QMHNX has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to AQMNX (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AQMNX dropped -27.50% vs QMHNX's -40.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AQMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 2.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.