PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AQMIX vs. MBXIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AQMIX vs. MBXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund - Class I (AQMIX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AQMIX achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly lower than MBXIX's 12.91% return. Over the past 10 years, AQMIX has underperformed MBXIX with an annualized return of 4.33%, while MBXIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.68% annualized return.


AQMIX

1D
-0.09%
1M
2.13%
6M
5.39%
YTD
10.24%
1Y
23.61%
3Y*
11.95%
5Y*
13.71%
10Y*
4.33%
ALL TIME*
3.97%

MBXIX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-2.01%
6M
8.54%
YTD
12.91%
1Y
17.43%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
7.68%
ALL TIME*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

AQMIX vs. MBXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AQMIX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund - Class I
10.24%14.62%8.13%2.08%35.47%-1.04%-0.43%1.92%-8.88%-0.97%
MBXIX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I
12.91%4.35%13.49%-0.67%7.72%16.89%-0.45%13.83%-2.16%13.99%

Correlation

The correlation between AQMIX and MBXIX is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2015

0.24

The correlation between AQMIX and MBXIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.36 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AQMIX vs. MBXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AQMIX
AQMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AQMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AQMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

MBXIX
MBXIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MBXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MBXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AQMIX vs. MBXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund - Class I (AQMIX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AQMIXMBXIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.40

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.20

3.88

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.43

14.92

-0.50

AQMIX vs. MBXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AQMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the MBXIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AQMIX and MBXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AQMIX vs. MBXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AQMIX drawdown since its inception was -26.52%, smaller than the maximum MBXIX drawdown of -31.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQMIX and MBXIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AQMIXMBXIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.52%

-31.73%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.14%

-3.85%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.57%

-15.59%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.57%

-15.59%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.17%

-31.73%

+9.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.12%

-2.68%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.93%

-3.95%

-5.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

1.04%

+0.45%

Volatility

AQMIX vs. MBXIX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund - Class I (AQMIX) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) at 1.59%. This indicates that AQMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AQMIXMBXIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

1.59%

+1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.39%

4.89%

+2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.57%

6.90%

+2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.60%

11.40%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.26%

13.36%

-3.10%

AQMIX vs. MBXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AQMIX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MBXIX's 2.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

AQMIX vs. MBXIX - Dividend Comparison

AQMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, while MBXIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AQMIX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund - Class I
2.05%2.26%3.83%8.39%12.76%6.94%5.31%3.13%0.00%0.00%0.02%6.51%
MBXIX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I
0.00%0.00%2.63%2.25%7.74%0.00%4.27%5.18%3.33%3.33%1.91%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AQMIX and MBXIX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AQMIX has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to MBXIX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AQMIX dropped -26.52% vs MBXIX's -31.73%.

AQMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AQMIX and MBXIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer