PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AQGNX vs. QMNNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AQGNX vs. QMNNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Global Equity Fund Class N (AQGNX) and AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N (QMNNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AQGNX achieves a 12.84% return, which is significantly higher than QMNNX's -5.98% return. Over the past 10 years, AQGNX has outperformed QMNNX with an annualized return of 13.11%, while QMNNX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.01% annualized return.


AQGNX

1D
-0.81%
1M
5.46%
YTD
12.84%
6M
14.33%
1Y
32.72%
3Y*
27.78%
5Y*
15.03%
10Y*
13.11%

QMNNX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.33%
YTD
-5.98%
6M
-3.37%
1Y
3.79%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
16.89%
10Y*
6.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AQGNX vs. QMNNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AQGNX
AQR Global Equity Fund Class N
12.84%31.37%24.14%22.74%-14.45%18.04%8.96%22.24%-14.69%25.02%
QMNNX
AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N
-5.98%26.19%25.43%16.30%27.07%17.38%-19.79%-11.55%-11.94%5.56%

Correlation

The correlation between AQGNX and QMNNX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AQGNX vs. QMNNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AQGNX
AQGNX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
AQGNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQGNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQGNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AQGNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQGNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

QMNNX
QMNNX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
QMNNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMNNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMNNX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
QMNNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMNNX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AQGNX vs. QMNNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Global Equity Fund Class N (AQGNX) and AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N (QMNNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AQGNXQMNNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.09

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

0.40

+2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.09

0.92

+14.17

AQGNX vs. QMNNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AQGNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the QMNNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AQGNX and QMNNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AQGNXQMNNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

0.50

+1.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

1.81

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.73

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.83

-0.25

Drawdowns

AQGNX vs. QMNNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AQGNX drawdown since its inception was -35.76%, smaller than the maximum QMNNX drawdown of -39.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQGNX and QMNNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AQGNXQMNNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.76%

-39.22%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.90%

-8.41%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.51%

-8.41%

-10.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.72%

-13.98%

-15.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.76%

-39.22%

+3.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-6.37%

+5.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.29%

-10.61%

+3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

3.63%

-1.46%

Volatility

AQGNX vs. QMNNX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Global Equity Fund Class N (AQGNX) has a higher volatility of 3.45% compared to AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N (QMNNX) at 2.81%. This indicates that AQGNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMNNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AQGNXQMNNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

2.81%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.24%

5.24%

+5.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.28%

6.72%

+6.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.18%

9.40%

+8.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.90%

8.30%

+9.60%

AQGNX vs. QMNNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AQGNX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than QMNNX's 5.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

AQGNX vs. QMNNX - Dividend Comparison

AQGNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.76%, more than QMNNX's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AQGNX
AQR Global Equity Fund Class N
11.76%13.27%13.26%5.82%4.30%12.07%1.08%1.26%4.74%4.75%10.16%0.00%
QMNNX
AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N
1.34%1.26%6.06%21.67%5.77%1.41%17.64%3.86%0.49%3.37%1.19%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


AQGNX and QMNNX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AQGNX has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to QMNNX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AQGNX dropped -35.76% vs QMNNX's -39.22%.

AQGNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AQGNX and QMNNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer