AQEC vs. GXLC
AQEC (AQE Core ETF) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. AQEC is actively managed, while GXLC is passively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AQEC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.
Performance
AQEC vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AQEC achieves a -6.71% return, which is significantly lower than GXLC's 8.02% return.
AQEC
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- -6.71%
- 6M
- -7.40%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXLC
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- YTD
- 8.02%
- 6M
- 6.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AQEC vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AQEC AQE Core ETF | -6.71% | 3.90% |
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 8.02% | 2.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between AQEC and GXLC is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AQEC vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQE Core ETF (AQEC) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AQEC vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AQEC drawdown since its inception was -12.81%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQEC and GXLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AQEC | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.81% | -9.08% | -3.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.04% | -3.31% | -5.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.24% | -1.57% | -3.67% |
Volatility
AQEC vs. GXLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AQEC | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.49% | 13.75% | -1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.49% | 13.75% | -1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.49% | 13.75% | -1.26% |
AQEC vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
AQEC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
AQEC vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison
AQEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than GXLC's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AQEC AQE Core ETF | 0.96% | 0.13% |
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 0.65% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AQEC and GXLC have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AQEC.
AQEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.65% for GXLC.
They also come from different issuers: Arlington Asset Management and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AQEC and 0.02% for GXLC.
Find the right allocation for AQEC and GXLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer