APXM vs. AIOO

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

APXM (FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April) and AIOO (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, APXM returned 4.93% vs 5.12% for AIOO. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. APXM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for AIOO.

Performance

APXM vs. AIOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April (APXM) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with APXM having a 2.43% return and AIOO slightly higher at 2.47%.

APXM

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.25%
• 6M: 2.23%
• YTD: 2.43%
• 1Y: 4.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AIOO

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.09%
• 6M: 2.22%
• YTD: 2.47%
• 1Y: 5.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APXM vs. AIOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
APXM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April	2.43%	2.56%
AIOO AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF	2.47%	2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between APXM and AIOO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025	0.62

The correlation between APXM and AIOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

APXM vs. AIOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APXM

APXM Risk / Return Rank: 98
APXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
APXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
APXM Omega Ratio Rank: 98
APXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
APXM Martin Ratio Rank: 98

AIOO

AIOO Risk / Return Rank: 93
AIOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
AIOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
AIOO Omega Ratio Rank: 91
AIOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AIOO Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APXM vs. AIOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April (APXM) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	APXM	AIOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.97	2.49	+1.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.46	3.87	+2.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.07	1.48	+0.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.27	6.95	+1.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	50.04	20.05	+29.99

APXM vs. AIOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APXM Sharpe Ratio is 3.97, which is higher than the AIOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APXM and AIOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

APXM vs. AIOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APXM drawdown since its inception was -0.60%, smaller than the maximum AIOO drawdown of -0.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APXM and AIOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	APXM	AIOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.60%	-0.74%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.60%	-0.74%	+0.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-0.06%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.05%	-0.18%	+0.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.10%	0.26%	-0.16%

Volatility

APXM vs. AIOO - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April (APXM) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO) have volatilities of 0.60% and 0.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APXM	AIOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.60%	0.58%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.12%	1.42%	-0.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25%	2.06%	-0.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.36%	2.04%	-0.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.36%	2.04%	-0.68%

APXM vs. AIOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

APXM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AIOO's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

APXM vs. AIOO - Dividend Comparison

Neither APXM nor AIOO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APXM and AIOO in my portfolio?

APXM and AIOO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, APXM or AIOO?

APXM has higher volatility (0.60%) compared to AIOO (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APXM dropped -0.60% vs AIOO's -0.74%.

Which ETF is better, APXM or AIOO?

On 1-year performance, AIOO leads with 5.12% vs 4.93% for APXM. On fees, AIOO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, APXM or AIOO?

Over the 1-year period, AIOO has performed better with a 5.12% return vs 4.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, APXM or AIOO?

AIOO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for APXM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, APXM or AIOO?

APXM and AIOO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between APXM and AIOO?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for APXM and 0.64% for AIOO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APXM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.97 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.