PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APUE vs. VOTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APUE vs. VOTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF (APUE) and Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APUE achieves a 8.74% return, which is significantly higher than VOTE's 8.07% return.


APUE

1D
0.02%
1M
-1.48%
YTD
8.74%
6M
7.29%
1Y
23.91%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
10Y*

VOTE

1D
-0.07%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
8.07%
6M
6.78%
1Y
21.92%
3Y*
21.26%
5Y*
12.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APUE vs. VOTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
APUE
ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF
8.74%17.49%23.89%17.63%
VOTE
Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF
8.07%17.95%25.23%18.19%

Correlation

The correlation between APUE and VOTE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2023

0.98

The correlation between APUE and VOTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

APUE vs. VOTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
APUE
VOTE

Technology

37.6%
39.0%

Financial Services

11.4%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
9.9%

Communication Services

9.9%
10.7%

Industrials

9.3%
8.1%

Healthcare

8.6%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.4%

Energy

3.1%
3.2%

Basic Materials

2.0%
1.7%

Utilities

1.8%
2.0%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.7%

Technology

APUE
37.6%
VOTE
39.0%

Financial Services

APUE
11.4%
VOTE
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

APUE
10.3%
VOTE
9.9%

Communication Services

APUE
9.9%
VOTE
10.7%

Industrials

APUE
9.3%
VOTE
8.1%

Healthcare

APUE
8.6%
VOTE
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

APUE
4.4%
VOTE
4.4%

Energy

APUE
3.1%
VOTE
3.2%

Basic Materials

APUE
2.0%
VOTE
1.7%

Utilities

APUE
1.8%
VOTE
2.0%

Real Estate

APUE
1.6%
VOTE
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APUE vs. VOTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APUE
APUE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
APUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
APUE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
APUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
APUE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

VOTE
VOTE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VOTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOTE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VOTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOTE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APUE vs. VOTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF (APUE) and Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APUEVOTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.31

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

2.42

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.05

10.58

+1.47

APUE vs. VOTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APUE Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the VOTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APUE and VOTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APUE vs. VOTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APUE drawdown since its inception was -18.83%, smaller than the maximum VOTE drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APUE and VOTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APUEVOTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.83%

-25.71%

+6.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-9.10%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.83%

-19.08%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-3.35%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.07%

-6.09%

+4.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.08%

-0.09%

Volatility

APUE vs. VOTE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF (APUE) is 4.59%, while Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that APUE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APUEVOTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

4.84%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.84%

10.06%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.67%

12.69%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.73%

17.18%

-2.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.73%

17.16%

-2.43%

APUE vs. VOTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

APUE has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than VOTE's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

APUE vs. VOTE - Dividend Comparison

APUE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than VOTE's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
APUE
ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF
0.77%0.83%0.79%0.41%0.00%0.00%
VOTE
Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF
0.96%1.03%1.18%1.33%1.54%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, APUE and VOTE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VOTE has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to APUE (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APUE dropped -18.83% vs VOTE's -25.71%.

On 3-year performance, VOTE leads with 21.26% vs 20.83% for APUE. On fees, VOTE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, APUE has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VOTE has performed better with a 21.26% return vs 20.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOTE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for APUE.

VOTE has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.77% for APUE.

They also come from different issuers: ActivePassive and Engine No. 1 LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for APUE and 0.05% for VOTE.

APUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APUE and VOTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer