PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APUE vs. GXLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APUE vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF (APUE) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with APUE having a 8.71% return and GXLC slightly lower at 8.31%.


APUE

1D
-1.31%
1M
-0.79%
YTD
8.71%
6M
7.66%
1Y
24.90%
3Y*
20.51%
5Y*
10Y*

GXLC

1D
-1.32%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
8.31%
6M
7.39%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APUE vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
APUE
ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF
8.71%3.48%
GXLC
Global X U.S. 500 ETF
8.31%3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between APUE and GXLC is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025

0.99

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APUE vs. GXLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APUE
APUE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
APUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
APUE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
APUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
APUE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

GXLC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APUE vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF (APUE) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APUEGXLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.63

APUE vs. GXLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APUE vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APUE drawdown since its inception was -18.83%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APUE and GXLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APUEGXLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.83%

-9.08%

-9.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-3.05%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.06%

-1.54%

-0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

Volatility

APUE vs. GXLC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APUEGXLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.73%

13.85%

-1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

13.85%

+0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.75%

13.85%

+0.90%

APUE vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

APUE has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

APUE vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison

APUE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, more than GXLC's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
APUE
ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF
0.77%0.83%0.79%0.41%
GXLC
Global X U.S. 500 ETF
0.65%0.30%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, APUE and GXLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for APUE.

APUE has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.65% for GXLC.

They also come from different issuers: ActivePassive and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for APUE and 0.02% for GXLC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APUE and GXLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer