APUE vs. DFND
APUE (ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. APUE is actively managed, while DFND is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, APUE returned 22.12%/yr vs 7.91%/yr for DFND. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. APUE charges 0.33%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.
Performance
APUE vs. DFND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
APUE
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 10.99%
- 6M
- 11.14%
- 1Y
- 29.02%
- 3Y*
- 22.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFND
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -1.09%
- 1Y
- 0.20%
- 3Y*
- 7.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.16%
APUE vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
APUE ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF | 10.99% | 17.49% | 23.89% | 18.42% |
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.00% | 10.37% | 8.48% | 8.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between APUE and DFND is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2023 | 0.23 |
APUE vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
APUE
DFND
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Technology
APUE
DFND
Financial Services
APUE
DFND
Consumer Cyclical
APUE
DFND
Communication Services
APUE
DFND
Industrials
APUE
DFND
Healthcare
APUE
DFND
Consumer Defensive
APUE
DFND
Energy
APUE
DFND
Basic Materials
APUE
DFND
Utilities
APUE
DFND
-
Real Estate
APUE
DFND
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APUE vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank
APUE
DFND
APUE vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF (APUE) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APUE | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.02 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 0.07 | +3.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.17 | 0.13 | +15.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APUE | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 0.02 | +2.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.61 | 0.36 | +1.25 |
Drawdowns
APUE vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APUE drawdown since its inception was -18.83%, smaller than the maximum DFND drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APUE and DFND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APUE | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.83% | -22.65% | +3.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.98% | -3.44% | -5.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.83% | -12.56% | -6.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -3.69% | +3.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.07% | -5.70% | +3.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 3.70% | -1.78% |
Volatility
APUE vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison
ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF (APUE) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that APUE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APUE | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 0.00% | +2.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.08% | 6.16% | +2.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.20% | 10.92% | +1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.65% | 22.46% | -7.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.65% | 19.09% | -4.44% |
APUE vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison
APUE has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
APUE vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison
APUE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than DFND's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APUE ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF | 0.75% | 0.83% | 0.79% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.62% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APUE and DFND have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APUE has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APUE dropped -18.83% vs DFND's -22.65%.
On 3-year performance, APUE leads with 22.12% vs 7.91% for DFND. On fees, APUE is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, APUE has performed better with a 22.12% return vs 7.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
APUE is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.
APUE has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.62% for DFND.
They also come from different issuers: ActivePassive and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for APUE and 1.50% for DFND.
APUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APUE and DFND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer