PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APRP vs. PFRL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

APRP vs. PFRL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP) and PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

APRP vs. PFRL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
APRP
PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April
1.89%7.80%10.28%
PFRL
PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF
-0.51%6.25%6.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APRP achieves a 1.89% return, which is significantly higher than PFRL's -0.51% return.


APRP

1D
1.32%
1M
0.92%
YTD
1.89%
6M
4.25%
1Y
13.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PFRL

1D
0.12%
1M
0.48%
YTD
-0.51%
6M
1.06%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
8.43%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


APRP vs. PFRL - Expense Ratio Comparison

APRP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PFRL's 0.72% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

APRP vs. PFRL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRP
APRP Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
APRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
APRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRP Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

PFRL
PFRL Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PFRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFRL Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PFRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFRL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRP vs. PFRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP) and PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APRPPFRLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

0.63

+0.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.10

0.77

+1.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.34

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

0.67

+1.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.80

6.10

+5.70

APRP vs. PFRL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APRP Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the PFRL Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APRP and PFRL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APRPPFRLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

0.63

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

1.57

-0.53

Correlation

The correlation between APRP and PFRL is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

APRP vs. PFRL - Dividend Comparison

APRP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PFRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.83%.


TTM2025202420232022
APRP
PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFRL
PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF
7.83%7.34%8.96%9.84%3.55%

Drawdowns

APRP vs. PFRL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRP drawdown since its inception was -13.66%, which is greater than PFRL's maximum drawdown of -8.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRP and PFRL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


APRPPFRLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.66%

-8.83%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.24%

-7.87%

-0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.78%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.33%

-0.46%

-0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

0.86%

+0.36%

Volatility

APRP vs. PFRL - Volatility Comparison

PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP) has a higher volatility of 1.98% compared to PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) at 0.74%. This indicates that APRP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


APRPPFRLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.98%

0.74%

+1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

1.61%

+1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.96%

8.53%

+1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.76%

4.96%

+4.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.76%

4.96%

+4.80%