PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APRJ vs. MSTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APRJ vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APRJ achieves a 3.54% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -31.90% return.


APRJ

1D
0.12%
1M
0.32%
6M
3.41%
YTD
3.54%
1Y
6.46%
3Y*
6.03%
5Y*
10Y*

MSTZ

1D
-11.25%
1M
29.92%
6M
-7.52%
YTD
-31.90%
1Y
266.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APRJ vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
APRJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April
3.54%5.71%1.66%
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
-31.90%-38.95%-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between APRJ and MSTZ is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024

-0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APRJ vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRJ
APRJ Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
APRJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
APRJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTZ
MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRJ vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APRJMSTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.07

1.31

+0.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

16.30

3.16

+13.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

78.25

6.14

+72.10

APRJ vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APRJ Sharpe Ratio is 4.19, which is higher than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APRJ and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APRJ vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRJ drawdown since its inception was -4.68%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRJ and MSTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APRJMSTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-99.38%

+94.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.40%

-84.89%

+84.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-97.68%

+97.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.12%

-94.54%

+94.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.08%

43.66%

-43.58%

Volatility

APRJ vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ) is 0.45%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 57.19%. This indicates that APRJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APRJMSTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.45%

57.19%

-56.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.31%

135.18%

-133.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56%

148.74%

-147.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.59%

171.04%

-167.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.59%

171.04%

-167.45%

APRJ vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

APRJ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

APRJ vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

APRJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
APRJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April
5.75%5.46%5.88%4.88%
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


APRJ and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTZ has higher volatility (57.19%) compared to APRJ (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APRJ dropped -4.68% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 266.72% vs 6.46% for APRJ. On fees, APRJ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, APRJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 266.72% return vs 6.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

APRJ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

APRJ has the higher dividend yield at 5.75%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

APRJ is categorized as Options Trading, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for APRJ and 1.05% for MSTZ.

APRJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.18 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APRJ and MSTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer