PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APR-UN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

APR-UN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Automotive Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (APR-UN.TO) and SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

APR-UN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APR-UN.TO
Automotive Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
5.44%8.92%5.09%-10.65%-100.00%-100.00%-4.25%45.84%-11.07%9.90%
SRU-UN.TO
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust
6.74%13.10%6.13%0.16%-11.27%48.64%-19.65%6.97%5.77%1.14%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

APR-UN.TO:

CA$629.95M

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$4.92B

EPS

APR-UN.TO:

CA$0.87

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$1.44

PE Ratio

APR-UN.TO:

13.08

SRU-UN.TO:

18.71

PS Ratio

APR-UN.TO:

5.73

SRU-UN.TO:

5.08

PB Ratio

APR-UN.TO:

0.87

SRU-UN.TO:

0.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

APR-UN.TO:

CA$101.84M

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$927.28M

Gross Profit (TTM)

APR-UN.TO:

CA$85.88M

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$564.58M

EBITDA (TTM)

APR-UN.TO:

CA$70.93M

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$486.20M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APR-UN.TO achieves a 5.44% return, which is significantly lower than SRU-UN.TO's 6.74% return. Over the past 10 years, APR-UN.TO has underperformed SRU-UN.TO with an annualized return of -96.76%, while SRU-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 4.40% annualized return.


APR-UN.TO

1D
1.69%
1M
-0.86%
YTD
5.44%
6M
3.69%
1Y
19.23%
3Y*
6.04%
5Y*
-99.91%
10Y*
-96.76%

SRU-UN.TO

1D
1.43%
1M
-1.78%
YTD
6.74%
6M
4.42%
1Y
13.69%
3Y*
8.34%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*
4.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APR-UN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APR-UN.TO
APR-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
APR-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APR-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
APR-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
APR-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
APR-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SRU-UN.TO
SRU-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SRU-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRU-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRU-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SRU-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRU-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APR-UN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Automotive Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (APR-UN.TO) and SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APR-UN.TOSRU-UN.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.28

1.07

+0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

1.55

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.19

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

2.29

-0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.64

6.20

-0.55

APR-UN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APR-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the SRU-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APR-UN.TO and SRU-UN.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APR-UN.TOSRU-UN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

1.07

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-1.09

0.45

-1.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-1.43

0.21

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.11

0.35

-1.46

Correlation

The correlation between APR-UN.TO and SRU-UN.TO is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

APR-UN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

APR-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, more than SRU-UN.TO's 6.84% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APR-UN.TO
Automotive Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
7.19%7.39%8.36%7.46%1,281,617.42%1,206,997.42%7.51%6.62%8.96%7.37%897,946.98%3,487,274.35%
SRU-UN.TO
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust
6.84%7.18%7.56%7.42%6.90%5.74%8.01%5.81%5.72%5.55%5.17%5.34%

Drawdowns

APR-UN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APR-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.01%, which is greater than SRU-UN.TO's maximum drawdown of -68.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APR-UN.TO and SRU-UN.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


APR-UN.TOSRU-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.01%

-68.25%

-31.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.24%

-6.39%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-100.01%

-28.89%

-71.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.01%

-54.78%

-45.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-2.71%

-97.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-99.12%

-11.06%

-88.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.55%

2.36%

+1.19%

Volatility

APR-UN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Automotive Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (APR-UN.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO) at 3.81%. This indicates that APR-UN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRU-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


APR-UN.TOSRU-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

3.81%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.12%

8.51%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.07%

12.85%

+2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

91.69%

16.24%

+75.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.74%

21.57%

+46.17%

Financials

APR-UN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Automotive Properties Real Estate Investment Trust and SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
27.94M
247.54M
(APR-UN.TO) Total Revenue
(SRU-UN.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

APR-UN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Automotive Properties Real Estate Investment Trust and SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%85.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
84.8%
58.6%
Portfolio components
APR-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Automotive Properties Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 23.67M and revenue of 27.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.8%.

SRU-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 145.12M and revenue of 247.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.6%.

APR-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Automotive Properties Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 25.87M and revenue of 27.94M, resulting in an operating margin of 92.6%.

SRU-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 131.22M and revenue of 247.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.0%.

APR-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Automotive Properties Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 14.92M and revenue of 27.94M, resulting in a net margin of 53.4%.

SRU-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 105.50M and revenue of 247.54M, resulting in a net margin of 42.6%.