SRU-UN.TO vs. RS.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO) and Real Estate Split Corp. (RS.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SRU-UN.TO or RS.TO.
Key characteristics
| SRU-UN.TO | RS.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.86% | 12.97% |
| 1Y Return | 21.94% | 10.73% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.91% | -0.75% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.07 | 0.37 |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.26% | 25.04% |
| Max Drawdown | -90.51% | -40.60% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.50% | -17.34% |
Fundamentals
| SRU-UN.TO | RS.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$4.62B | CA$101.58M |
| EPS | CA$1.64 | -CA$0.80 |
Correlation
The correlation between SRU-UN.TO and RS.TO is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SRU-UN.TO vs. RS.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SRU-UN.TO achieves a 14.86% return, which is significantly higher than RS.TO's 12.97% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SRU-UN.TO vs. RS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO) and Real Estate Split Corp. (RS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SRU-UN.TO vs. RS.TO - Dividend Comparison
SRU-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%, less than RS.TO's 11.69% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRU-UN.TO SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust | 6.82% | 7.43% | 6.91% | 5.75% | 8.02% | 5.81% | 5.72% | 5.54% | 5.15% | 5.34% | 6.15% | 6.15% |
RS.TO Real Estate Split Corp. | 11.69% | 12.13% | 11.14% | 7.11% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SRU-UN.TO vs. RS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRU-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -90.51%, which is greater than RS.TO's maximum drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRU-UN.TO and RS.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SRU-UN.TO vs. RS.TO - Volatility Comparison
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to Real Estate Split Corp. (RS.TO) at 4.06%. This indicates that SRU-UN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
SRU-UN.TO vs. RS.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust and Real Estate Split Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities