APR-UN.TO vs. ZWH.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Automotive Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (APR-UN.TO) and BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWH.TO).
ZWH.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Feb 9, 2014.
Performance
APR-UN.TO vs. ZWH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
APR-UN.TO vs. ZWH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APR-UN.TO Automotive Properties Real Estate Investment Trust | 3.05% | 8.92% | 5.09% | -10.65% | -100.00% | -100.00% | -4.25% | 45.84% | -11.07% | 9.90% |
ZWH.TO BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF | 3.51% | 6.40% | 19.30% | 5.04% | -0.57% | 24.20% | 0.19% | 17.18% | 0.10% | 5.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APR-UN.TO achieves a 3.05% return, which is significantly lower than ZWH.TO's 3.51% return. Over the past 10 years, APR-UN.TO has underperformed ZWH.TO with an annualized return of -96.77%, while ZWH.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.03% annualized return.
APR-UN.TO
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -4.02%
- YTD
- 3.05%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 17.32%
- 3Y*
- 5.23%
- 5Y*
- -99.91%
- 10Y*
- -96.77%
ZWH.TO
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 4.63%
- 1Y
- 8.82%
- 3Y*
- 10.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.58%
- 10Y*
- 9.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APR-UN.TO vs. ZWH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
APR-UN.TO
ZWH.TO
APR-UN.TO vs. ZWH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Automotive Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (APR-UN.TO) and BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APR-UN.TO | ZWH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 0.62 | +0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 0.91 | +0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.14 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 0.86 | +0.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.74 | 2.72 | +2.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APR-UN.TO | ZWH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 0.62 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -1.09 | 0.83 | -1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -1.43 | 0.61 | -2.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.11 | 0.75 | -1.86 |
Correlation
The correlation between APR-UN.TO and ZWH.TO is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
APR-UN.TO vs. ZWH.TO - Dividend Comparison
APR-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, more than ZWH.TO's 6.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APR-UN.TO Automotive Properties Real Estate Investment Trust | 6.70% | 7.39% | 8.36% | 7.46% | 1,281,617.42% | 1,206,997.42% | 7.51% | 6.62% | 8.96% | 7.37% | 897,946.98% | 3,487,274.35% |
ZWH.TO BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF | 6.23% | 6.22% | 4.87% | 5.71% | 6.03% | 5.64% | 6.59% | 5.97% | 5.66% | 5.46% | 5.57% | 5.31% |
Drawdowns
APR-UN.TO vs. ZWH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APR-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.01%, which is greater than ZWH.TO's maximum drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APR-UN.TO and ZWH.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| APR-UN.TO | ZWH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.01% | -34.01% | -66.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.14% | -11.79% | +2.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -100.01% | -15.59% | -84.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -100.01% | -34.01% | -66.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -2.51% | -97.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -99.12% | -3.14% | -95.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | 3.95% | -0.40% |
Volatility
APR-UN.TO vs. ZWH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Automotive Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (APR-UN.TO) and BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWH.TO) have volatilities of 3.63% and 3.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| APR-UN.TO | ZWH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 3.75% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.96% | 7.44% | +1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.98% | 14.48% | +0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 91.68% | 11.59% | +80.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.75% | 14.83% | +52.92% |