APR-UN.TO vs. FC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Automotive Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (APR-UN.TO) and Firm Capital Mortgage Investment Corporation (FC.TO).
Performance
APR-UN.TO vs. FC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
APR-UN.TO vs. FC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APR-UN.TO Automotive Properties Real Estate Investment Trust | 3.05% | 8.92% | 5.09% | -10.65% | -100.00% | -100.00% | -4.25% | 45.84% | -11.07% | 9.90% |
FC.TO Firm Capital Mortgage Investment Corporation | 1.97% | 6.87% | 20.14% | 11.21% | -19.55% | 20.36% | -6.50% | 20.36% | 8.82% | 2.16% |
Fundamentals
APR-UN.TO:
CA$619.45M
FC.TO:
CA$475.78M
APR-UN.TO:
CA$0.87
FC.TO:
CA$0.96
APR-UN.TO:
12.87
FC.TO:
12.32
APR-UN.TO:
5.63
FC.TO:
6.77
APR-UN.TO:
0.86
FC.TO:
1.12
APR-UN.TO:
CA$101.84M
FC.TO:
CA$68.18M
APR-UN.TO:
CA$85.88M
FC.TO:
CA$54.28M
APR-UN.TO:
CA$70.93M
FC.TO:
CA$46.50M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APR-UN.TO achieves a 3.05% return, which is significantly higher than FC.TO's 1.97% return. Over the past 10 years, APR-UN.TO has underperformed FC.TO with an annualized return of -96.77%, while FC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 7.10% annualized return.
APR-UN.TO
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -4.02%
- YTD
- 3.05%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 17.32%
- 3Y*
- 5.23%
- 5Y*
- -99.91%
- 10Y*
- -96.77%
FC.TO
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -4.14%
- YTD
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- 7.51%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 4.63%
- 10Y*
- 7.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APR-UN.TO vs. FC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
APR-UN.TO
FC.TO
APR-UN.TO vs. FC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Automotive Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (APR-UN.TO) and Firm Capital Mortgage Investment Corporation (FC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APR-UN.TO | FC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 0.69 | +0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 1.00 | +0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.13 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 1.14 | +0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.74 | 2.95 | +1.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APR-UN.TO | FC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 0.69 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -1.09 | 0.30 | -1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -1.43 | 0.37 | -1.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.11 | 0.53 | -1.65 |
Correlation
The correlation between APR-UN.TO and FC.TO is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
APR-UN.TO vs. FC.TO - Dividend Comparison
APR-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, less than FC.TO's 7.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APR-UN.TO Automotive Properties Real Estate Investment Trust | 6.70% | 7.39% | 8.36% | 7.46% | 1,281,617.42% | 1,206,997.42% | 7.51% | 6.62% | 8.96% | 7.37% | 897,946.98% | 3,487,274.35% |
FC.TO Firm Capital Mortgage Investment Corporation | 7.98% | 8.70% | 8.31% | 9.13% | 8.89% | 6.61% | 7.42% | 6.83% | 7.50% | 7.72% | 7.02% | 7.83% |
Drawdowns
APR-UN.TO vs. FC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APR-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.01%, which is greater than FC.TO's maximum drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APR-UN.TO and FC.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| APR-UN.TO | FC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.01% | -49.63% | -50.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.14% | -6.65% | -2.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -100.01% | -29.03% | -70.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -100.01% | -49.63% | -50.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -4.55% | -95.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -99.12% | -5.23% | -93.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | 2.57% | +0.98% |
Volatility
APR-UN.TO vs. FC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Automotive Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (APR-UN.TO) and Firm Capital Mortgage Investment Corporation (FC.TO) have volatilities of 3.63% and 3.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| APR-UN.TO | FC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 3.72% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.96% | 7.00% | +1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.98% | 10.92% | +4.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 91.68% | 15.54% | +76.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.75% | 19.14% | +48.61% |
Financials
APR-UN.TO vs. FC.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Automotive Properties Real Estate Investment Trust and Firm Capital Mortgage Investment Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
APR-UN.TO vs. FC.TO - Profitability Comparison
APR-UN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Automotive Properties Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 23.67M and revenue of 27.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.8%.
FC.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Firm Capital Mortgage Investment Corporation reported a gross profit of 15.87M and revenue of 17.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 93.1%.
APR-UN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Automotive Properties Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 25.87M and revenue of 27.94M, resulting in an operating margin of 92.6%.
FC.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Firm Capital Mortgage Investment Corporation reported an operating income of 15.43M and revenue of 17.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 90.5%.
APR-UN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Automotive Properties Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 14.92M and revenue of 27.94M, resulting in a net margin of 53.4%.
FC.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Firm Capital Mortgage Investment Corporation reported a net income of 8.74M and revenue of 17.05M, resulting in a net margin of 51.2%.