APPX vs. QTJL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

APPX (Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, APPX returned -6.08% vs 20.28% for QTJL. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. APPX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.

Performance

APPX vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF (APPX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APPX achieves a -53.50% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 7.18% return.

APPX

• 1D: -3.79%
• 1M: 30.52%
• YTD: -53.50%
• 6M: -55.75%
• 1Y: -6.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTJL

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 1.08%
• YTD: 7.18%
• 6M: 7.93%
• 1Y: 20.28%
• 3Y*: 19.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APPX vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
APPX Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF	-53.50%	329.60%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	7.18%	28.04%

Correlation

The correlation between APPX and QTJL is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025	0.45

Return for Risk

APPX vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APPX

APPX Risk / Return Rank: 13
APPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
APPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
APPX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
APPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
APPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 68
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 71
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APPX vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF (APPX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APPX	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.04	2.04	-2.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.96	2.90	-1.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.41	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.07	3.05	-3.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.12	16.05	-16.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

APPX vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APPX Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the QTJL Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APPX and QTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APPX	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04	2.04	-2.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.52	+0.10

Drawdowns

APPX vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APPX drawdown since its inception was -82.40%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APPX and QTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	APPX	QTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.40%	-33.40%	-49.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-82.40%	-6.68%	-75.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.84%	0.00%	-63.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.32%	-7.93%	-29.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	48.83%	1.27%	+47.56%

Volatility

APPX vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF (APPX) has a higher volatility of 41.73% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 0.30%. This indicates that APPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APPX	QTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	41.73%	0.30%	+41.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	121.72%	7.60%	+114.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	141.05%	9.99%	+131.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	140.44%	20.42%	+120.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	140.44%	20.42%	+120.02%

APPX vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

APPX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

APPX vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

APPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.17%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
APPX Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF	20.17%	9.38%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APPX and QTJL in my portfolio?

APPX and QTJL have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, APPX or QTJL?

APPX has higher volatility (41.73%) compared to QTJL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APPX dropped -82.40% vs QTJL's -33.40%.

Which ETF is better, APPX or QTJL?

On 1-year performance, QTJL leads with 20.28% vs -6.08% for APPX. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, APPX or QTJL?

Over the 1-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 20.28% return vs -6.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, APPX or QTJL?

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for APPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, APPX or QTJL?

APPX has the higher dividend yield at 20.17%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.

What is the main difference between APPX and QTJL?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for APPX and 0.79% for QTJL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.